https://archives.uwp.edu/files/original/1743a67bc9e03ae47c95f1c1d6a7fd9f.pdf 9d60e58f75ab971ac53014e6893aa693 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource University of Wisconsin - Parkside Ranger News Description An account of the resource Student newspaper of UW-Parkside Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Issue Volume 10, issue 27 Headline Used for newspapers, the Headline element describes the main article of the issue. Liddy creates stir at UW-P Series Number The series number of the original collection. UWPAC124 Ranger News Text Any textual data included in the document Sy/P University of Wisconsin - Parkside Watergate m astermind Liddy creates stir at UW-P Editor's note: This story is an interpretive account about G. Gordon Liddy's current appearance at Parkside. by Ken Meyer Editor Never have I witnessed the commotion and activity surrounding a speaker at this campus. The occasion: convicted felon, and Watergate mastermind, G. Gordon Liddy. Liddy's three - hour program was accompanied by students protesting his appearance on campus, citing that PAB was showing that crime does pay, and a press interview that was 4-1/2 hours after it was scheduled. The interview, originally scheduled for 7 p.m. (Liddy spoke at 8 p.m.) was postponed until after his speech because, according to Coordinator of S tudent Activities Buddy Couvion, Liddy didn't want to have to repeat himself by being asked the same question twice. Some people felt that for $4500, which was Liddy's fee, he should not mind answering the same question twice — after all, he's been on the lecture circuit for a few years now, so he knows how to give his programmed answers. The one thing I noticed, listening to the many questions from the politically diverse audience, was that Liddy, being the astute speaker - on - the - circuit that he is, was able to "answer" the questions by avoiding the point of the question and slanting his reply to what he wanted to say. The crowd was so immense that the 683 c apacity in the cafeteria did not suffice in holding the number of people present. The solution to the problem was that the late - comers without advance tickets had the choice of not attending or sitting in the Union Cinema Theater where Liddy's speech was piped in over the sound system. But they still had to pay the same price to hear him while almost 700 people were able to see and hear the fearless exFBI agent and government official speak about "Government: Public Perception vs. Reality." Those in the theater were allowed to stand in the back of the cafeteria after 20 minutes, giving ticket - holders the first chance to have a seat. Photo by Mark Sanders LIDDY spoke to approximately 700 people. April 23 "Thurber Carnival" to open "A Thurber Carnival," the zany comic revue which showcases both the visual and verbal wit of one of America's favorite humorists, is the Parkside Dramatic Arts Discipline's spring production, on stage for the next two weekends in the Communication Arts Theater. Performances are at 8 p.m. on April 23, 24 and 30 and May 1 and at 2 p.m. on April 25. Admission is $2.50 for UW-P students and staff and for senior citizens ; $3.50 for others. Advance tickets are available at the Campus Union Information Center and reservations may be made by calling 553-2345 or 553-2042. Thurber's special view of homo - Americanus first appeared in New Yorker magazine cartoons and sketches. They gained a new dimension in a Broadway stage production in 1961 which featured Liddy spoke for about one hour and fifteen minutes before answering questions from the audience. His speech consisted of such topics as the draft, the U.S. - Russia weaponry war, spying, government spending, government bureaucracy, and his life history, including stories about the FBI and his trial for his part in the Watergate scandal. Among the comments he made were: On the draft, he has told his son, "Count on it being a part of your life." Liddy said that the Soviets have a larger military reserve and while the United States' armed forces consists of 17 divisions, Russia's is made up of 180 divisions. Spies, according to Liddy, "are the nation's ears and eyes." Spies look for two things: what are the capabilities of other nations (friend or foe) and what are their intentions. Concerning Ronald Reagan's economic policies, Liddy offered one of his many analogies: "You can burn a house down in a night, but you can't rebuilt (it) in a day." Liddy said that 77% of the federal budget is out of control and nothing can be done until Congress changes the laws, but it won't. Aides within a presidential administration, said Liddy, are not friends and are continually jockeying for top position to the President. That can be seen by looking at the Nixon administration in which Liddy was a Photo by Mark Sanders PROTESTORS were quite evident outside the door of the cafeteria, where Liddy spoke. part of. Liddy summarized his autobiography, "Will," saying how he went through the FBI as an agent for five years, became a deputy prosecutor in the ultra - conservative Duchess County in New York and finally maneuvered his way to Washington, D.C. as a part of the Treasury Department. Liddy took pot shots at many others involved in the activities in Washington, including John Dean, Daniel Ellsberg and Judge John Sirica. Ellsberg leaked what became known in the media as "The Pentagon Papers," which gave the detailed history of American involvement in the Vietnam War. In another of his many analogies, Liddy compared "The Pentagon Papers" to playing a poker hand with somebody from the opposing side standing behind you looking at your carcb. Liddy conceded that the editors of the New York Times, which ran "The Pentagon Papers," did not print all of the information leaked to them because some of the information was a serious threat to national security. But, Liddy pointed out, somebody gave all the information, including the highly sensitive material, to the Soviet Embassy, ruining the U.S.'s "poker hand." Sirica, who presided over the Watergate hearings, was referred to as "his eminence" by Liddy, who criticized Sirica to the fullest. Liddy said Sirica had two problems, the first not being Sirica's fault — "he was born stupid." Sirica's second problem, according to Liddy, was that while he gave many pronouncements on the law, Sirica wouldn't touch the issue of pre - trial publicity. Liddy said the pre - trial publicity of the Watergate trial was the biggest since the Lindbergh kidnapping. Liddy facetiously called Sirica "Time's Man of the Year" and went on to say that one of the jurors was found not to be able to speak English. The whole episode, according to Liddy, was sealed on orders from Sirica, who would have felt embarrassed if word leaked out. Liddy was sentenced to 21-1/2 years in prison for his part in the Watergate scandal, which he labeled as "political intelligence gathering." Liddy does not regard the Watergate break-in, along with breaking into Ellsberg's psychiatrist's office, as an illegal act because those laws don't apply to the President "or somebody acting for him" when national security is involved. When he went to prison, Liddy Continued On Page Three Committee investigates harassment Peggy Cass and Tom Ewell and captured a special Tony award. The revue includes such Thurber classics as "Walter Mitty" and "The Night the Bed Fell" and "Fables for Our Time" like "The Little Girl and the Wolf" and "The Unicorn in the Graden." All reflect the Thurber theme of the little guy battered by a bewildering civilization. Members of the cast, appearing in multiple roles, are Vicki Knapp, Racine; Rebecca Julich, Racine; Mary Beth Kelleher, Kenosha; Patricia Casciaro, Kenosha; John Vocino, Kenosha; John Miskulin, Racine; Andrew Brhel, Cudahy; Scott Reichelsdorf, Kenosha; and David Schroeder, Kenosha. Leon Van Dyke directs, scenic design is by Charles Erven and costumes by Barbara Thompson. All are members of the dramatic arts faculty. by Pat Hensiak News Editor Sexaual harassment is thought to be by many a touchy subject. It is difficult to determine what type of behavior falls under sexual harassment, and what does not. On a finer scale, Parkside is developing a means of education and awareness to sexual harassment and is establishing a way to informally resolve any cases of sexual harassment. The definition of sexual harassment has been described as follows in the policy statment: unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other physical conduct and ex- • pre ssive behavior of a sexual nature where: (1) submission to such conduct is made either explicitly or implicitly a term or condition of an individual's employment or education; (2) submission to or rejection of such conduct by an individual is used as the basis for academic or employment decisions affecting that individual; or (3) such conduct has the purpose of effect of substantially interfering with an individual's academic or professional performance or creating an intimidating, hostile or demeaning employment or educational environment. Sexual harassment is considered a form of sex discrimination. The situation may occur in a number of varieties. The common element that all of these situations share is some sort of inappropriate introduction of sexual activities or comments into the work or learning experience. The relationships involved can be of unequal power, in compliance with requests for sexual favors as a criterion for granting work, study or grading benefits, or the relationship can be one of equal power and repeated sexual advances or demeaning verbal behavior can have a harmful effect on a person's ability to study or work in an academic setting. A concerted effort is being made to protect employees and students from sexual harassment. The establishment of programs to educate members of the university community on the subject of sexual harassment, and to make them more sensitive to its forms and damaging consequences, is being worked out at this time. The main purpose of the educational function being to make people aware of the definition of sexual harassment, and to inform them of the psychological impact of sexual harassment. It is important that the university community be made aware of the differences between legitimate behavior and inappropriate behavior. The program will be implemented by the sexual harassment advisory committee. The committee will assist those people who feel they are victims of sexual harassment. The role of the committee member will be one of a mediator. Committee members are individuals to whom the victim can go and talk, on an informal basis and confidentially. The committee member will then approach the accused and talk with them on an informal basis. In this format, everything is informal and confidential. Perhaps a resolution can be reached, never having to put a complaint in writing. Within the policy statement, the functions of the Advisory committee are as follows: • To advise the Chancellor on all matters relating to sexual harassment; • To advise and assist the Chancellor in devising programs designed to inform employees and students of the nature of sexual harassment to increase their sensitivity to it, and to publicize the procedures, sanctions and remedies available against it. • To assist in informal mediation efforts when so requested by the Chancellor or Chancellor's delegate; • To serve in an ombudsman role in matters relating to sexual harassment; • To give advice, counsel, and assistance to members of the university. Members of the Sexual Harassment Advisory Committee are Stella Gray and Wayne Johnson, representing the faculty; Karen Lourigan, Carrie Peters and Jackie Willems, representing classified staff; Linda Piele and Stuart Rubner, representing academic staff; Carla Thomas and Pat Hensiak, representing students. If a university member feels mistreated, they should contact one of the above mentioned. 2 Thursday, April 22,1982 RANGER /'before we settle down to vote ON T HE RESOLUTION A GAINST GUN C ONTROL I'D L IKE T O T HANK BUCK SC HATZMAN FOR HIS BEAUTIFUL PLAQUE OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT HERE. To the E ditor Research does not make a good teacher the opposition to G. Gordon Liddy? by Chuck Ostrowski Last Monday, Parkside had the good fortune to be exposed to a point of view not usually presented. I am referring to G. Gordon Liddy, the author of WILL, his testimonial about the Watergate scandal of a decade ago. A controversy erupted several weeks ago when Liddy's appearance was announced. Petitions were circulated in protest of Liddy receiving $4500- for his lecture on Monday. More useful and needed items could be purchased with that kind of money, the argument went. Paying a criminal to broadcast his views and ideas was not in the best interests of the students here, whose tuition was used to pay for Mr. Liddy's lecture. However, others argued that G. Gordon Liddy is a historical figure directly involved in an illegal break - in and wire - tapping that led to the disclosure of other crimes now headlined under the common term "Watergate." Mr. Liddy is directly part of a scandal that forced the President of the United States to resign his office. That doesn't happen all the time, and to be part of anybody connected with this historical event whose effects are unprecedented is something we should all be supporting, not challenging. But I really don't believe that opponents of Mr. Liddy were necessarily concerned about paying him $4500. Although that is a significant amount of money it is certainly not a large percentage of the overall UW budget. I do believe, however, that those opposed to his presence here were practicing what could be called "liberal fascism." This amounts to opposing any point of view that is to the far right of their own. Of course, I'm sure these students wouldn't mind Liddy appearing here if he paid all the expenses, including lights and hot water. But we'd certainly be unable to have him speak if that was the case. So, in order for us to hear Mr. Liddy's extraordinary views, expenses must be paid by us. It's the price we pay to educate ourselves with an assortment of views. I also cannot help but think that if a convicted felon from the left, like Abbey Hoffman, lectured here for the same fee and petitions were circulated protesting his appearance, the same students screaming because of Liddy's presence would be screaming "fascism" in response to opposition of Hoffman. This whole atmosphere equating money with particular points of view is wrong. It really shouldn't matter the amount of money we have to pay to hear any type of view. (Of course, this whole system of whoever has the money to spend gets what he or she wants is wrong, but that's another topic.) What should concern everybody, though, is that any type of philosophy available for us to consume should be gotten. This is college, where exposure to Reaganism and Maoism should happen at the same level. Decide for yourself. That's why I cannot understand opposition to Liddy. To deny others the chance to hear him because you don't agree with him is something that regularly happens in the USSR. And I'm sure Parkside's resident leftists would not all like to be accused of censorship, since that would definitely contradict what they should stand for: freedom to exposure to all ideas, regardless of each's meaning or effects. But maybe our residents aren't as radical as they regard themselves. How else could you explain their reaction to an often incoherent extremist like G. Gordon Liddy? Editor: As a non - tr aditional student at Parkside, I am really concerned by the policies regarding teacher contracts. I think my years of life experiences, including raising children, have given me some insight into what can be great about schools and what can be damaging to the students. The answer to both is 'teachers'. Unfortunately, in the elementary and secondary schools, good teachers are definitely the exception rather than the rule. The same situation seems to exist here at Parkside, where teachers are judged on the basis of their research. What are the requirements of this research, and who is capable of judging? The administration seems to think students are completely incapable of passing judgment on a teacher ; I think they are more capable than an instructor's peers, whose judgment is often influenced by petty politics or imagined threats to their positions. I find it absolutely incredible that this condition exists here. It should not surprise me, I suppose. So many people my age just accept things as they are, without looking beneath the surface or asking questions. I have seen some really awful teachers — both in public and private sphools — and could not believe that other parents were unaware of them. Or perhaps it was ignorance, or unconcern. These same people, returning to school, would probably not care if they had mediocre teachers. The traditional students, too, seem very tolerant of poor teaching. This is probably because they simply have had so many bad ones they don't expect anything better. Most of these students questions things about our society, and are much more politically aware than I was at their age. Making changes is not an easy process, but young adults today certainly have the intelligence and energy to bring it about. Good teachers teach their students to THINK. But perhaps that is not considered desirable by everyone. People are much more easily controlled, and society much less complicated, if no one questions anything. Kindness and caring are traits that are necessary for a good teacher. Those that make petty rules, with infractions punishable by lower grades, must be very insecure and resort to trivial methods to exert their authority. But perhaps the subject matter does not lend itself to dedication. Even a machine could fill one's head with cold, hard facts, necessary for technical fields, I suppose, and certainly valued — money wise — in our society today. Behavioral science, on the other hand, where one is dealing with people and not machines, requires special instructors. Jim Bearden is one of these. Along with a few other really special sociology teachers, he is what teaching should be about. It's unfortunate that more students do not take courses with these instructors; it is an enlightening experience. The world needs people who care about other people. Teachers certainly should set an example by treating students as the intelligent people they are, and by teaching them to think. Otherwise, who will question the actions of our government, especially now when our country is contributing to the slaughter of i nnocent people in other countries, while ignoring starvation and poverty here at home? I hate to think that this university favors research - minded instructors who do not have the inclination, or are not allowed the time, to be dedicated teachers. Somewhere along the way the real purpose of schools has been lost: namely, to teach students. I wonder how many taxpayers are aware of this trend, and how would they vote if given a choice: Should your tax - supported university be for teaching or research? Lorene Wynn Views on punk rock were "slanted" Dear editor: In response to a letter your paper printed last week, we feel the public has a "right to know" the truth in regards to the punk rock phenomena. The purpose of this short, buf pertinent, letter will be to highlight the misconceptions in Mr. Kiesling's recent rebuttal. We now will turn our attention to the issue at hand. Mr. Kiesling (or Bob; far be it for us to intrude on the "power of the individual"): Your rebuttal has been acknowledged. However, in the interest of fairness (so staunchly advocated by John Rawls), we feel it is our obligation to the public to reveal the truth. This letter will concern itself with punk rock and its underlying concepts. Previous to the construction of our earlier article we researched several areas of the phenomena (which we call punk rock) from different sociological and philosophical perspectives. From this information it is plainly visible that our statements were not the expression of two irate individuals, but instead the response of society at large. You stated you have never met anyone who described the "genre" as "intolerable and disgusting," and hope never to meet anyone who Stop opposition to punk rock Dear Editor, We're writing in reply to the letter on stopping punk rock. We were very impressed by the grammar and usage of the English language, however, we felt the letter was quite repetitious and the point simple enough to have been condensed into one paragraph, therefore our point shall be kept short. We felt discouraged by the narrow thinking expressed in the letter. While it is true that punk rock is basically an anarchist movement, and that if ignored would vanish, letters of this negative type keep the punk fires burning. Punk rock has flourished because of negative media attention. Every time the words "punk rock" are mentioned, another curious person becomes interested in finding out what it is all about. Thus letters such as the one that appeared in the Ranger two weeks ago helped the movement more than it hurt it. What really scares us is the flipped - out way in which the authors of the letter in question regard the first Amendment to the Constitution of these United States. Sure, they have freedom of speech, but why should they criticize and infringe on punk - rockers' rights on Freedom of Expression? They would ban punk rock just because they didn't like it. What if they didn't like organized religion? Should we ban it? To tell the truth, while punks loudly desecrate the American way, and expand the ways of Anarchy, they actually revere the U.S. and Democracy, at least in relation to Socialism and Communism. Democracy is the only system in which punk rock could exist. Thus we say that although punks and punk rock may express the unjustness of today's Democratic system, fear not that they will ever become an organized group vowing to spread anarchy ; how can anarchy ever become organized? Obviously, those authors are very close minded in the view of people they don't understand. It is this kind of view that breeds prejudice which therefore induces more separation of the people which is just the opposite of what our society needs today. This kind of clear cut good and evil is encouraged by Communist countries, in which, from what we've seen in the letter, "How Can We Stop Punk Rock?", the authors would have nothing to complain about if they lived in one since the government would already dictate how the people act, dress refers to it as "indignant." Obviously you have certain social boundaries outside of which you must rarely venture. In fact, the three terms must be used consecutively, in one thought, to capture the impact concerning Middle - America's viewpoints on punk rock. I am not speaking of the Middle - American offspring of the late fifties and early sixties, I am speaking of t he mature Middle - America: the working man. If you still question the truth of such assertions, we can give you the names and addresses of various social establishments, where you can encounter a myriad of people and ascertain whether our earlier statements were objective. In reference to your inference that capitalistic society advocates the rock music industry (in lieu of its monetary input), we should like to point out that prostitution and pornography are also multi - billion dollar businesses within the capitalistic structure. It is evident capitalistic society does not advocate these degenerative practices, yet they flourish. Why? We feel the real problem is the ever - increasing, egocentric power of the individual and its ever - rising consequent: a lack of social responsibility. Such a dilemma is analogous to a stubborn and spoiled child, who always wants to receive and never replace. In essence, the individual has been allowed to roam free without regard to the costs society has to bear. Thus, individual autonomy has become perverse. In summary, we see that although certain practices exist in a capitalistic culture, they are not necessarily a benefit to that culture — they are a detriment. Speaking of individualism, you have conveniently disregarded (with or without intent) the main crux of our first letter. It seems you have not comprehended the negative aspects of a founand think. We feel that no one should criticize punk rock unless it really affects them. No one has to be involved in it. So why don't those two authors just listen to their own advice and ignore it. Just let it be!!! . - - The Deviants dationless individualism as advocated by modern arm - chair philosophers (i.e. Jean - Paul Sartre). This individualism, based on moral and personal freedom, is closely related to punker ideology. Furthermore, it is an individualism no one has been able to completely live up to. Bob, if you cannot grasp philosophical jargon, then do not attempt to refute philosophically based arguments. Your letter also contained a misconception concerning Neo - Darwinism (relating back to 1935). Perhaps if you had read the letter a bit more discriminantly you would have realized we did not advocate a "right - wing totalitarian" government (in fact, we claimed it was neither ethical or workable). Regardless, in theory it would be a way to rid our capitalistic society of the punk rock menace. In closing, you have, like punk rock, failed to provide a viable and rational alternative to capitalism. Punkdom, based on anarchy, only reinforces our original concept of punk rock as a trivial and socially "indignant" cult. As you saw in our previous article, this warrants society a right to extinguish and dismantle it. By the way Bob, we view disco as socially distasteful and thus, extinguishable also. Bob, we do appreciate your concern, even though your crucial issues were expressed from a subjective point of view (or what journalists term as a "slanted" viewpoint). One final suggestion, if you wish to broaden your musical scope you should try listening to the socially and individually redeeming music of Bob Wills and The Texas Playboys. Jack Zurawik and Dave Odders RANGER Thursday, April 22, 1982 3 Liddy Continued From Page One said, he saw fear on the faces of the prison guards and prisoners after revealing his educational background. (He earned a bachelor of science degree from Fordham College and a doctor of law from the Fordham Law School.) The most powerful weapon one could have, said Liddy, is education. This statement didn't really prove itself to be reliable when Liddy later answered questions from the audience concerning education. Liddy first joked about the question and answer session, as he did with many other topics throughout the evening, and corrected the English used by the first person posing a question. Repeatedly throughout the rest of the question and answer session Liddy evaded the basic issue of the questions and answered what he wanted to say. Or else, he gave one insignificant example to try to prove a point that couldn't be summed up in one selective example. The first question dealt with how the U.S. and the Soviet Union will go about the Cold War — wi ll war break out or will there be peace? Liddy said that when you prepare for peace, you also prepare for war and that with the nature of man, your enemies will attack you. He compared it to the Law of the Yukon — the weak shall perish while the strong will thrive. Asked how America can get strong and maintain a free society without major, inhibiting fears, Liddy said about Reagan, "He has a chance (to do so) as long as you the American people have patience. Reagan knows what to do — all we have to do is let him do it." Liddy said that one major problem is that the current federal economic program is not exactly what Reagan asked for, so he can't be blamed if t he program fails. Liddy said that the television movie based on his autobiography was O.K. but that the original three - hour version was edited an hour and the story was fictionalized a bit. One question, from a conservative audience member, pointed out that some people (mainly him) didn't want tax money going for social change, but would rather have it go towards political change. Many people in the audience amazedly listened to the point of the "question" (which was more of a statement than a question). That shows the diversity of the audience — the entire political spectrum that exists in the American political system (which isn't all that much, by the way) was represented in the audience and heard from the opposing viewpoints. In response to a question about Richard Nixon's drinking while in the White House, Liddy said, "I never saw him drunk or even the slightest bit under the influence of alcohol." The subject of nuclear war was brought up and the point was raised that why does American have to match Russia in conventional warfare weaponry when the war will be a nuclear one. Liddy said the U.S. needs more tanks if we don't want Russia to take over Europe. "If we want to be isolationists, we don't have to worry about tanks until they come from north and south," Liddy said. He also said that the worry is more likely to come from the south considering the Soviet influence in Central America. Liddy said that although he recommended it be done, he was not ordered to kill Washington columnist Jack Anderson, who wrote a revealing story that endangered a spy's life. Liddy said the government was justified to have Anderson killed ("All governments commit homicides from time to time to protect their nations."). Some students asked Liddy whether he approved of cutting programs such as education to build up the national defense. Liddy said, "Yes." Liddy said you cannot increase intelligence with education — it's the raw material that really counts. Liddy said that people are trying to "put a price on our freedom — a nd that's one thing we can't afford to do." He said people are still able to receive a higher education — " It can be done — it just takes a little courage." Asked what he would be doing now if he didn't get caught in Watergate, Liddy said, "I'd probably be slaving away in the Reagan administration." He was also quuck to point out that he doesn't know Reagan and that he's never been offered any type of job with the administration. Looking back over his speech and answers, many people, including myself, found Liddy to be very condescending toward negative questions. "Let me explain to you how it works ..." is a sample start of on e of his replies that eventually would ignore the point of the question and consist of what he wanted to say about the topic at hand. If he didn't ignore it, Liddy would touch on the specific issue very vaguely and then proceed on his merry way to wherever he wanted to go. Another problem was Liddy turning the tables on the people asking questions by going for a laugh when asked about a touchy Photo by Mark Sanders LIDDY shows his scarred left hand to person who asked to see it during the question - and - answer period. issue. After disarming the questioners with humor (sometimes funny, sometimes not) Liddy then answered the questions in what I believe are his programmed answers that he knows so well after being on the lecture circuit for a few years. A sad point about his jokes — the audience laughed and acknowledged Liddy when Liddy brought up killing John Dean and Jack Anderson. I hope that that doesn't directly reflect the nature of today's society — th at criminal government officials are spared the application of the law because they are who they are, and, after serving one - fifth of their prison term (if they get one) they are let loose on the lecture circuit to make a lot of money. And the people support them. Liddy did not allow taping of t he program because, if broadcast, it would "lower his market value." The no taping rule is a double standard considering he was addressing about 700 people (making it definitely "public" in the legal sense of the word) while Liddy illegally wire - tapped many people throughout his career. Concerning his market value, the question was raised whether or not Liddy's $4500 fee was too much. Although I feel people received their money's worth for two, three or four dollars because hearing different viewpoints is necessary to become politically mature, I feel that the $4500 fee was too much to pay. If you can't put a price on freedom, education, etc., you certainly can't put a price (such a high one) on becoming politically aware. Overall, the evening was very stimulating and interesting, but the question of whether or not it tfas worth the money bringing Liddy here has not — and probably cannot — be satisfactorily answered. Q.: How does it feel knowing that many people don't like you? A.: By definition reputation means what other people think of you. That's not within your control. By contrast, by definition, character means what you really are. There's no way in the world I can affect your character — only you can affect your character. Character is 100% in your control and your reputation is not in your control. Wtat I do is not really worry or care about reputation. I just concentrate on character. Q.: You had a lot of ways you met your fears head on to eliminate them. Are there any you prepared for, meeting your fears in prison? A.: By then I didn't have any. When I went into prison my attitude was not somehow in here I must survive. My attitude was the way it is whenever I go into any situation and that is somehow in here I shall prevail and let these poor bastards survive me. Q.: In your book you said you would have had no qualms about breaking the law if so ordered by your superiors or if it was something good for the government. Yet you have this very negative attitude towards people in the '60s who practiced civil disobedience as a protest to the Vietnam War. Is there a discrepency there? A.: In the book I made the distinction as to what I w ould and would not do. Between malum in se, evil in and of itself, which I have never been asked to do and wouldn't do even if I were asked, and malum prohibitum, which means the abscence of statutes prohibiting it, is morally indifferent. I don't have any quarrel with an individual who elects to practice civil disobedience providing that the individual is willing to do what I did. You get caught, you get convicted, you go to jail. What kind of annoys me about those people is that when they get caught, get convicted and go to jail they start to whine and play the violin and snivel, and that does not inspire in me either respect or confidence. An interview with G. Gordon Liddy Q.: Do you really believe that if John Dean hadn't talked that you could have kept a lid on Watergate? A.: Absolutely. He and (Jeb) Magruder. You'd have to add Magruder into that. Q.: What's your views on El Salvador and how should the U.S. go about aiding them or not aiding them? A.: El Salvador is a leftist government under attack from the right and from the Communists. There are perhaps, tops, 6500 Communist guerrillas which are attacking from that side. They are, however, being directed by very sophisticated directional and communicational equipment mounted in Nicaragua. They're being armed by the Soviets and Cuba and Nicaragua. What we ought to be doing is pretty much what we are doing, which is economic aid because what these Communists are doing are attempting to destroy the ability of the peasants to be able to raise food. They do that by blowing up water conduits and blowing up dams so they can't get their products to market. As for military stuff, primarily what we ought to be doing is training their people. It doesn't do any good to send over 60 helicopters if they've only got nine pilots. Q.: Do you see any relation between El Salvador and Vietnam? A.: No, and I'll tell you why. El Salvador is closer to Washington D.C. than many major cities in the U.S. Vietnam is 9 - 10,000 miles away. El Salvador, as I said, you have 6500 Communists. They aren't all that well organized amongst themselves nor have they been for that long. Whereas in Vietnam you had a Viet Cong infrastructure that went back all the way to . . . post WWII. Q.: How do you feel about gun control? A.: Well, first of all, my position in respect to guns is that I was in a business in which a gun was as much a tool as that pencil is to yours . . . When you're in something like the FBI a gun is a tool and you would be well advised to master it. There is also the extra added element in the fact that the mastery of that gun is the best life insurance policy you could ever buy in that kind of v ery dangerous business. Gun control doesn't work, never has. We have 22,000 gun control laws on the books of this country today. Another one isn't going to help it any. If (I had) a magic wand and I could go 1, 2, 3 and every gun — shoulder guns, shotguns, handguns — i n the U. S. would just vanish in a puff of smoke overnight, you'd still have 96.4% of a ll serious crime ... as defined by the FBI. Q.: How about guns and domestic quarrels, suicides, accidents with children? A.: There are relatively few accidents with children. You do have domestic quarrels . . . When you get an individual in such a rage that he is ready and willing to take the life of his wife, if he's got a gun he'll use it. If he doesn't have a gun, he'll pick up an iron and bash her skull in, pick up a kitchen knife and cut her liver out. That's what that kind of murderous rage will do. I've been in prisons and the professional criminals tell me they hope that there is gun control because there's absolutely no way that anyone is going to stop them from having a gun. They would be delighted to have the assurance that when they go in someplace that they're not going to be opposed by (someone who) has a gun who could possibly blow them away. Q.: How long have you been on the speaking circuit? A.: Theoretically, I suppose I started in 1978. I got out of prison in late 1977. T o the extent that I lecture now, which is about 80 universities and colleges a year and about 70 of what we call corporate dates, all of which are not for corporations. Q.: And you get $4500 for each speech? A.: No, sometimes I get considerably more. Q.: How long is this going to be lucrative? A.: I'm told for as long as I want to do it, probably for the rest of my life. Q.: Is that what you'll do? Do you have anything else? A.: Well, I hope to get some rest. For example, I just came from Berkeley today. Tomorrow I go to North Carolina, then I go to Buffalo, Indianapolis, Daytona Beach and I hope that at some point I'll be able to take it a little easier because I have two other businesses I have to attend to also. I am one of the owners of Gemstone Security; we have a full - service industrial security corporation. I also have to spend one week out of every four in Florida, where I tape, two a day, the syndicated television show "Cause and Effect." I'm going to go right back to what I'm doing now. Then I have to write an article for Playboy, then I gotta write another book. I'm negotiating to sell one of my other books now for a movie, so I really have a lot of things that I have to do. Q.: What kind of books are you writing? A.: The first one I wrote was fiction and the one they want me to write next will be another fiction book. Q.: Are they about all you know about covert operations? A.: You know, they say write about what you know. I'm not at all sure that I could turn out a very credible novel about the inside story on life in a girls' school. Q.: How did your family take Watergate? A.: Well, adverse circumstances are going to do one thing or the other. They're either going to defeat you or make you much, much stronger. (The axiom goes) what does not kill me makes me stronger. And that's how it worked out with my family. Q.: Do you want your children to follow in your footsteps? A.: No, I would want my children to follow life as they perceive life ought to be . . . What I tell my children is you do what you want to do and whatever it is you be the very best at it possible. Q.: Do you think that we could have a conventional war with the U.S.S.R.? A.: If you mean, do I think we could have a real war with the U.S.S.R. with neither side using nuclear weapons — n o. Once the genie's out of the bottle, it's out of the bottle. Q.: Do you believe in the possibility of a limited nuclear war? A.: I'm not at all sure that there's any such thing as a limited nuclear war. Period. Q.: Let's say a limited exchange — they throw one at us, we throw one at them and that's it. A.: I don't know. I can you know, speculate on a scenario, if you will, in which they throw a thing at us and we throw one at them and both are so horrified out of it that no one goes further. I don't know. What I know is the nature of man. Q.: Are you still on parole? A.: No, that was a little joke I always tell. Q.: Do you carry a gun? A.: I'm not allowed to carry a gun. However, Mrs. Liddy has quite a few guns in the house. And if somebody were to come through the window in my house I would not hesitate to blow him right out the other side of it. Q.: Do you still burn yourself? A.: No, the reason for that is that just as in weightlifting you have to keep increasing the weight, otherwise it doesn't do you any good. And the last time I did it, which was years ago, I was told by the surgeons that if I did it any more severely I would disable myself. At that point you are clearly at the point of what they Continued On Page Seven 4 Thursda y, April 22,1982 RANGER WOW! What A Selection PARKSIDE UNION 10:00 am - 4:00 pm • S PE AR M I NT LEAV ES • J UBE J EL LS • C AR AM ELS • C AR A M EL BULLIES • ROYALS • T OF FE ES • J O TS • B RI DGE M IX • M A L TED MILK BALLS • CHOC. C RE M E D RO P S • CHOC. R AISIN S • CHOC. P E A NU TS • P E A NUT B U T TER C U PS • STA RS • Y OG U RT P E A NU TS • CAROB M A L TED MILK BALLS • CAR OB P E A NU TS • S UN FL OW ER SE EDS • CARIBBEAN DELICACY • CALIFORNIA MIX • S TU D E NT FOO D • GIANT CASHEWS • NATURA L PISTACHIOS • SPA NISH P E A NU TS • BLA N C HED P E A NU TS • Y OG U RT RAISINS • Y O G U RT S E S A M E B RITTLE • RED SKIN P EA N U TS • M INT COO LERS • STA R LIGHT MINTS • SOUR BALLS • CINN AMON DISKS • C O F FEE • BUTTERSCOTCH DISKS • ROO T B EER B A R RE LS • P O PS • P E A N UT B U T T ER KISSES • P EP PE RMI N T KISSES • LICORICE B UL LIES •JELLY BEA NS • ASS ORTED P ER KYS • O R A NGE S LICES Burned u p Daylight can't be saved by Carol Burns As the semester draws to a close, Parkside students might be asking themselves why it seemed to take forever. This spring term was three weeks longer than fall's term to start with, but that's not all that has added to its length. No, students, we've been duped. We spent the majority of the present semester in regular time, as opposed to "Daylight Savings Time." The switchover happens again this weekend. Sometime during the night between Saturday and Sunday, we will "lose" an hour. That means that for the next six months, the days will only be 23 hours long, and for the last six months they've been 25 hours long! Just keep in mind that all homosexual. Dyan Cannon has always struck me as a pretty good actress trying to break out of one - dimensional roles. Not that the role of Sidney Bruhl's airy wife in this film has a hell of a lot of depth, but it's not a cardboard role either. And Cannon plays it to the hilt, displaying an acting talent I didn't know she had. Or maybe she just never got a chance to show it off. Continued On Page Five these days actually consist of 24 hours. (Have I lost you yet?) Who set this mess up anyways? Exactly what are we saving? Daylight cannot be saved, except on pictures or movies. It can't be frozen. And it's all really too bad. It sure would be nice to move daylight around. Then we could use it the way we can use video - tape - recorders. Daylight Savings Time has one major flaw: It should have been arranged so that the 25 - hour days came in summer, when the weather (hopefully) is better. Instead, the winter days are longer, even though they're shorter. The present set - up is also detrimental to students — just when we really need all the extra time to catch up on classes, write papers, etc., it gets taken away from us. Well, maybe it's not all that bad: Tuition could have been set up by hours in time instead of hours per semester. Maybe someday it will be the same time everywhere, even though it has got to be earlier or later somewhere else. I now leave you, totally confused. If you want to know what time it is, ask somebody else — I'm planning to lose my watch. Distributed by E. F. MADRIGRAN O 1831 - 55th St. Kenosha, Wise. 658-3553 "Deathtrap" is most a lluring Put a little weekend in your week. bv Tony Rogers Feature Editor The mystery - thriller - whodunit genre is one of the most fun (for lack of a better word) types of film, and it's not often that a really interesting whodunit is spotted. But Sidney Lumet's new film "Deathtrap" has enough plot twists to throw any armchair detective off the trail, and is worthy of investigation. Michael Caine stars as Sidney Bruhl, a middle - aged, 'written out' playwright, who watches his latest play royally bomb on Broadway in the film's opening. Returning home to his wife (Dyan Cannon), Bruhl discovers the complete script to a play sent to him by one of his former students, a play so good that, in Bruhl's words, "Couldn't be destroyed, even by a gifted director." Bruhl is so intent on churning out a successful play that he decides to invite the former student to his home, kill him, and then market the play as his own. In fact, the unwitting author does come to Bruhl's abode, and Bruhl does kill him. Or so we think. This is where the film's numerous plot twists begin, and so, instead of revealing all of these twists and ruining the movie for you, I'll let you see it for yourself. One thing I can tell you though. The plot is wickedly interesting. Christopher Reeve co - stars as Clifford Anderson, the young homosexual playwright. Quite a change from playing Superman obviously, but Reeve handles the transition with ease. This is no easy task, because no matter how realistically Chris plays a character, he still, well, looks like Superman. That image of him as the man of steel has quickly flown into the American psyche, and it's hard to forget about that and suddenly believe that he is playing, of all things, a Synthesizers set 'Moog' of the day by Joe Kimm First came the theremin. It was invented by a scientist in the depths of the Bell laboratories. It was in the sixties that commercial groups first began using this device to augment their sound in search of a new gimmick. Bob Moog developed it into the Moog synthesizer which was later utilized by several rock groups as an addition to their array of keyboards. Keith Emerson of ELP, was one of the first customers to use his prototype. His stage show consisted of alternating between traditional church sounds of the Hammond m-2 and the new innovative sounds that came forth from this new Moog synthesizer. Other groups soon followed suit, including groups like Yes, Genesis, Gentle Giant, and the Moody Blues. Some even went as far as to form a group consisting entirely of keyboard synthesizer musicians aka Gary Wright and his band. This later developed into fancy loop effects and other fancy computer sounds produced by artists like Brian Eno who among others were noted for his genius with finding new sounds. Pretty soon people were catching on to this new dimension in sound and it became a big fad to color disco songs with crazy dittos. Recent bands like Gary Neuman hit the top 10 with this techno - rock clique and it became a common place thing. It is an integral part of today's music and most bands have a keyboard player who fiddles with the knobs and cranks out computer - like emissions. So what does this all mean? Well, for one thing, it reflects on society's values that relies on technology as a workhorse for the Vangelis tops in electronic grandeur by Tony Rogers Feature Editor This is the best synthesizer album I've ever heard. I haven't heard a hell of a lot of synthesizer music, but I have sampled Tangerine Dream, Isao Tomita, Jean Micheal Jarre, Yes, Orchestral Manouveres in the Dark, among others. Not much. I've always had trouble listening to most synthesizer music though. Most of it sounds like spacey sound effects, synthesizer for the sake of synthesizer, rather than listenable music. Vangelis' music is the exception. I first heard Vangelis synthesizer music as background music for Carl Sagan's famous t.v. show, "Cosmos." The music was majestic and beautiful, a perfect score to help Dr. Sagan convey the grandeur of the universe. I had to have the music, so when the "Cosmos" soundtrack came out I snatched it up immediately. Reading the album credits, I found that a Greek man named Vangelis with an unpronounceable last name had done the excellent music. So I started to buy Vangelis albums. I've got about eight or ten now. All are unique and immensely creative, more so than any other synthesizer music I've listened to, but "Heaven and Hell" is my favorite. The album, like most Vangelis albums, is a concept within itself. Entitled "Heaven and Hell," the music is about jus that. The titletrack consists of two major parts, each part about 21 minutes in length, and the individual cuts are distinguished by their supposed place of origin. Some cuts sound like people being tortured in hell, while others sound like the •heavenly hosts having a jam session. The best passages include the main theme from "Cosmos," several intricate synthesizer pieces combined with conventional keyboards pnd a Bosendorfer piano, and a passage that sounds something like a Gregorian chant with a female "Deathtrap" VANGELIS won an Oscar for his "Chariots" soundtrack. vocal lead. The album also includes a song that is separate from the titletrack concept, a sort of spacey love balland with Jon Anderson of Yes doing the vocals. In fact, Vangelis and Jon Anderson have done several albums together, Vangelis always composing and performing all the music, and Anderson writing and singing all lyrics. They seem to compliment each other nicely. Not all Vangelis albums are totally excellent and mind - blowing, but "Heaven and Hell" has some of the most violent and sporadic music I've ever heard, and some of the most tranquil and beautiful music I've ever heard. Recently Vangelis' popularity has skyrocketed, having won the Academy Award for the soundtrack he did for "Chariots of Fire." His albums are becoming more and more available in American stores, and for some reason they are often cataloged under the Jazz section. Oh well, if you're interested in buying a Vangelis album, look around, you're sure to find some somewhere. If you look. What follows is a basic analysis of some of his better and more popular albums. "666 - The Number of the Beast" This is not a Vangelis solo album, but one he did when he was with a group called "Aphrodites' Child" about 1970. This is more rock music than anything else, and is a pretty bizarre and creative musical tale about the coming of a supposed a nti-christ. Interesting, but not synthesizer. "Earth" An early solo album, filled with tribal sounds, gutteral chants, and rythmic drumbeats. Not a hell of a lot of synthesizer on this one either, and not much listenable music, but definitely an interesting venture on the artist's part. "Albedo .039" Now this is space music, well polished and nice sounding. A bit more commercial and less creative than H & H, but a nice album. Tgnacio" This is probably the most quiet of all Vangelis albums, the most soothing, and certainly one of the most graceful. After being bombarded by loud rock music all day, this album is like a cool breeze on a steamy summer day. Some material from this album was used for "Cosmos." "Chariots of Fire" soundtrack. This album includes all of the music from the film as well as some that was not used. Some of his best synthesizer work. Continued From Page Four This film about a play is actually based on a play. Got that? You can tell that it is based on a play — most of the action and dialogue takes place in one setting throughout the story, and there are only a minimal number of characters that populate this setting. This does not make the film boring, merely unique. Sparkling performances by all the actors within a witty and intriguing plot by Ira Levin make this film a most appealing trap. Student art work exhibited A juried show of work by Parkside art students will hang in the Comm. Arts Gallery through May 6. Chuck Toman, assistant curator of education at the Milwaukee Art Museum, will judge the show and determine the winners of three cash awards, to be presented at a reception from 7 to 9 p.m. on J • y yeJ&tde rye my mOrChuman endeavors. Maybe man has lost touch with his inner soul and has to rely on artificial methods and means of producing music, which is the most basic of all human expressions. It has taken the human element out of the creativity that must accompany the sensitive expression of human spirit in forming a viable means of aural communication. It is no longer in the hands of the artist in touch with his human pool of feelings. It is rather in the inner functions of a computer that spews forth every imaginable sound known to man processed by a few microchips smaller than the ordinary mind can imagine and these sounds have established themselves as the future direction in music, the definitive color of tomorrow's musical spectrum. On the other hand, it shows that there is an openness, an innovative curiosity toward ever - expanding the horizon of human aural experience. It points to a trend that shows no limits in generating new sounds with countless shades of color and tone to further stimulate the human plectrum. There is no telling what tomorrow holds in attractive new looks and gimmicks that will catch the listener's ear in expanding the horizon for artistic endeavors. It shows that technology can play a part in the arts which can lead to a new synthesis of old and the new, the sensual and the cerebral, the expressive and the programmable. It shows new promise in the oldest art in human history. Shakespeare forum to be held opening day of the show. The reception is open to the public. About 50 students will be represented by an estimated 150 works representing all media. The show will include work done by Parkside students under classroom supervision during the last two years and not previously exhibited in a student show. JM\AAAAAAAAAAAAA#VtAAAA#*AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA/W/< A forum on "The Public, the Schools and the Performance of Shakespeare" will conclude a two - day conference of Shakespeare scholars and teachers at Parkside on April 23 and 24. The forum, from 1:30 to 3:30 p.m. on April 24 in Molinaro Hall, Room 105, is free and open to the public. The conference on "Shakespeare in the Classroom," is sponsored by Parkside and the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction and the forum is supported by the Wisconsin Humanities Committee. Forum panelists will include John L. Styan, Franklin Bliss Snyder Professor of English at Northwestern University since 1977. Styan, who also will address a general session of the conference on April 23, was born in London and educated at Cambridge University. He has been a member of the British Broadcasting Corp. and Independent TV advisory committees in the United Kingdom and is currently chairman of the Academic Council of the Shakespeare Globe Theater Center for North America. Other panelists will include: Susan Willis, associate professor of English at Auburn University, Montgomery, Ala., who spent the past summer observing filming of several Shakespearean productions in the Graham Parker keeps Rumour's 'Gray Area' sparse BBC/TV series which will complete filming of all of the bard's plays next year; Thomas Collins, director of the Platteville Shakespeare Festival at UW-Platville, a summer troupe which presents three plays each year; Michael W. Bartos, professor of English at Harper College and director of its Shakespeare Festival, which includes performances, films, lectures and exhibits; Ted Swetz, an actor with the American Players Theater in Spring Green, cast last season in "Midsummer Night's Dream;" Patrick Nowak, manager of Ponderosa, Inc., of Racine, a 1976 English graduate of UW-P, who received a master's degree in business from UW-Whitewater. Rhoda Gale Pollack, professor of dramatic arts at UW-P and chairman of the Fine Arts Division, will act as moderator. Conference keynoter will be Gladys Veidemanis, English chairperson of North High School, Oshkosh, who is nationally known for her activities with the National Council of Teachers of English and serves as NCTE representative to the Educational Advisory Panel for the BBC/TV series. The conference was organized by Parkside English professor Andrew McLean, the author of a number of articles on Shakespeare on film and recipient of a 198 0 National Endowment for the Humanities grant for summer study at Stratford - on - Avon. by Bob Kiesling Graham Parker is one of those rare musicians who inhabits the ground between new wave and rock and roll. On his latest album, "Another Gray Area", Parker plays some high - intensity, but not necessarily heavy, rock with the anti - slick, anti - commercial tinge that often characterizes British new wave. That is not to say, though, that the record is poorly done. It is not. Parker and his band do a fine job of placing traditional rock idioms in a modern context. And, as a lyricist, Parker is one of the best rock and roll songwriters around. Most of the music is devoted to Parker's personal anger at the world. In the title song, he rages against an indifferent girlfriend who has left him "in another gray area". Parker uses his words sparingly, like Bob Dylan, to give the music the tension it requires to adequately express his feelings. Girls aren't the only subject he sings about, though. On "Dark Side of the Bright Lights", he rails against the degradation of the rock and roll partying scene, thus: "I an not gaining any ground here / You are not listening / You do not care." The one song on the album that is even vaguely upbeat, "You Hit the Spot", is also the most punkish. The interesting thing about Parker is that he is only effective lyrically when he's angry. It's just too much for him to sound nice when he's actually trying to be nice. Also interesting is the fact that he can't work in a straight new wave context either, certainly not up to his potential. Instrumentally, the album is quite good. Parker, of course, leads' the band on guitar, both electric and acoustic. He doesn't go in for fancy lead lines, and what solos he does play are short and concise. Aside from Parker, the outstanding musician here is Nicky Hopkins, the Who's session pianist. Except for an over-emphasis on drums, Parker's group acquits itself well. Not one of the solos is over a minute in length. This can be either good or bad, depending. Here it works well. No ego trips on this album. All in all, Parker is one of the least egotistical leaders to come along in years, and he has polished up his act considerably, even taking into account his excellent earlier work with the Rumour. So if you like economy in your music, and don't mind some vehement lyrics along with it, this record could be for you. Compared to his last album, "The Up Elevator", where he was in a good mood, "Another Gray Area" puts Parker back on familiar turf, where he can sit and observe the world while wearing his favorite sneer. Impressionists to perform Monday On Mon., April 26 the Union Cinema will be the site of a free show -entitled, "Men of a Thousand Voices," starring Steve Krause, Francis Beaumier, and Rebecca Julich. The show will be in the form of a play and will feature American Presidents, comedians, detectives, and entertainers, including Ronald Reagan, Peter Falk, Steve Martin, and many others. Steve and Francis have been performing together for about two years and have built up a repertoire of about two hundred voices. The show will be held at 1 p. m. 6 Thursday, April 22,1982 RANGER 2nd Annual Accent on Women production set ^ coiioquim Club Events A theatrical production titled "Ties That Bind" by the Wisconsin Women's History Ensemble and a keynote speech on "How to Get What You Want Out of Life" by Dr. Jessie Potter, a nationally known authority on human relationships, will highlight the second annual Accent on Women program at Parkside. Deadline for registration is April 30. The performance, which will be followed by a reception, will be at 8 p.m. on Friday, May 7 in the Communication Arts Theater. Drawn from documented sources, the play weaves together music,, drama, poetry, mime and dance to portray the lives of real women who lived in Wisconsin between the 1840s and the 1920s. The performance will preface a moderated discussion between the audience and the performers. Potter's talk, also in the theater, will begin an all - day program including a selection of 35 workshops and seminars on topics of interest to women at 9 a.m. on Saturday, May 8. Potter is a member of the faculties of the - University of Illinois Medical School, the Northwestern University Medical School, the National Sex Forum JESSIE POTTER and the Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality. She is nationally - known as an educator, lecturer, writer and counselor on marriage, human sexuality, intimacy and communication. She has been a guest on a number of television and radio programs including the Phil Donahue and David Susskind shows. Half - day seminar topics include assertive communication, choices by design, image makers, time management, middle essence, close encounter relationships and relaxation therapy and stress management. Workshops, which last 75 minutes, include on - the - job discrimination, confidence, futurism, handling stress through physical fitness, a Chicana perspective on womenhood, marital property reform, sex roles in transition, managing your own business, managing family and career, male - female relationships, aging families and investments. Registration forms and complete course descriptions are available by writing Accent on Women, UW-Parkside, P.O. Box 2000, Kenosha 53141 or phoning 414 / 553-2351 between 1 and 5 p.m. Fee for the evening performance and day - long program is $12.50 for the general public; $8.50 for UW-P students and includes luncheon. Tickets for the performance only are $3 and will be available at the door. In conjunction with the program, a number of community organizations and agencies will hold a fair to distribute information on their activities and services from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. on the Molinaro Hall Concourse. Security tips help you out by Vincent Gigliotti Crime prevention and awareness should be of concern to all members of the Parkside community. If an opportunity for a crime does exist, there is always someone available to take advantage of the situation. You can help stop crimes, especially theft, by just being aware of the scene of m ost crimes. A purse, wallet, books or any personal items left unattended in the library or lounge areas is open invitation for someone to become a thief. Eliminate the opportunity and you virtually eliminate crime. Be aware of your surroundings; if you see something that looks suspicious, or you believe a crime is being committed, notify the Security Department immediately. If y ou are the victim of a crime, call the Security Department at once. Too many times complaints are received hours or even days after an event has occurred. When Security is notified, an officer can be at the scene in a few minutes. The sooner a police officer is there, the better chances are of talking with other people in the area who may have additional information. The phone number for the Campus Security Department is on every phone, don't hesitate to use it. In an effort to help deter crime on campus, the Security Department in conjunction with the Student Life Office, is sponsoring a "Reward for Information on Crimes on Campus" program. Persons who give information on crimes that leads to the apprehension of the perpetrator may be entitled to a reward. A code system has been set up so that the reporting person may remain anonymous if they choose. A call to Security with the information is all that it takes to initiate the program. One reward has already been given out. Help yourself and help your friends, be aware of your surroundings. Eliminate opportunity for crime. Make the campus a better and safer place for everyone. On Friday, April 23 at 1 p.m. in Greenquist 113, Dr. Kelvin S. Rodolfo, of the department of Geology - University of Illinois, Chicago Circle, will talk on "Sedimentation, Arc Sundering, and Back - Arc Spreading in the Western Pacific." Pre-med On Wednesday, April 28 at 8 p.m., Lt. Lisa Lichter, M.D. will give an informal talk on her medical experiences. She has done a rotating internship in the Navy, and plans to specialize in dermatology. In addition, Dr. Lichter is one of the first two women from Parkside to attend medical school. Her experiences in the Navy include learning to fly and deep sea dive. Elections for next year's officers will take place at 7 p.m. The meeting is in the library D-l faculty lounge. PSE The second annual PSE LOOP 500 bicycle relay race will be held on the inner loop road on Wednesday, April 28, at 1 p.m. Each member will receive a LOOP 500 T-shirt and a beer in the Union. There is a nominal registration fee to cover costs. The event is expected to be as great a success as last year's. Computer Club Part three of Computer Graphics on display will be shown on Friday, April 23 in Greenquist 103. There will be two sessions this week from 1-2:30 and from 2:30-4 p.m. Some of the topics are the Evans and Sutherland Flight Simulator, Vidsizer — a combination of computer graphics and synthesizer effects, ZGRASS — a graphics system demonstration, and the Dubner demo tape. The event is free and open to the public. Accounting Club On Wednesday, April 28 at 7 p.m., the Accounting Club will sponsor a regional public accounting night. Representatives from three area accounting firms will speak at the meeting. It will be held in Union 104. Refreshments will be served. Political Science On Wednesday, April 28 in Union 207 at 3:30 p.m. Tony Earl, a Democratic candidate for governor will speak on the issues that will affect Wisconsin and the race for the governorship. There will be a time for questions and refreshments will be served. All students and faculty are welcome. Remember, the Political Science Club always needs new members. All are welcome. Pi Mu Epsilon The annual initiation ceremony for the Math Club is scheduled for Wednesday, April 28, at 1 p. m., in Grnqst. D127. Any student who is in Math 221 or above who is interested in joining is cordially invited to attend. There will be a discussion of mathematics as a major or minor, and refreshments will be served. A $4 initiation fee is charged by the national office to cover the expense of a membership certificate and a year's subscription to the mathematics publication that is put out by Pi Mu Epsilon. Anne Gaylor on abortion | Learn about McCarthy Parkside history professor Thomas C. Reeves, author <5f a major new biography, "The Life and Times of Joe McCarthy," will participate in a program on the making of a film about the Wisconsin senator from 1 to 3 p. m. on Wednesday, April 28, in Molinaro Hall, Room 105. Reeves served as a consultant for the 90 - minute film, "An American Ism: Joe McCarthy," which will be shown after his talk. The program, sponsored by the Library - Learning Center, is free and open to the public and will be followed by an autographing session where Reeves' book will be available. Concurrently, a display on Joe McCarthy, including materials Reeves used in researching his book, is on display on the Concourse Level of the library. Anne Gaylor, president of Protect Abortion Rights, an advocacy group involved in lobbying and educational programs, will speak on "Women's Reproductive Rights and the Hatch Amendment" at 7:30 p. m. on Tuesday, April 27 in Molinaro Hall, Room 107. The free public program is sponsored by Parkside Women's Concourse, a student organization. Gaylor, active in the pro - choice abortion movement since 1969, is co - founder of the Women's Medical Fund, a Madison organization which helps women fund abortions and is the author of TJiuversityof "Wisconsin-fiarfutide —? Communication Arts Theatre ——^ — April 25,~2(u*. / / ApriI30'^Yl, "6pm is now accepting applications for Editor HDRSER CARNML Tickets: Union lnfo.DesK fir at tho Doo/ 553-2345 553-2042 $2.50 Partuid. Students. -Staff', Smtio** $3.5© G«ne(U Public Citizens for the 1982-83 academic year. Applicants must be registered UWParkside students planning to take at least 6 credits each semester. Deadline for applications: Noon, May 7, 1982 ) Send application & resume to: a book titled "Abortion is a Blessing," published in 1975. The president of a national state - church separation group, she was active in the movement to recall Madison Judge Archie Simonson and worked in behalf of battered wife Jennifer Patri. She formerly was the editor of an award winning weekly newspaper and is a graduate of UW - Madison. Support wanted The University of Wis. Marshfield/Wood Co. campus is looking for former students to join a newly organized Alumni Association. The purpose of this organization is to provide continued support to the operations of the Marshfield Campus and the activities of its students and to promote social activities for the Alumni. Upcoming events include an open campus play day followed by a pig roast and a dance. Membership dues are $5 per year. Anyone interested in joining or obtaining further information should contact Jim Kress c/o U. W. - Marshfield, or call 384-3226. Hanger WLLC D139 UW-Parkside Kenosha, WI 53141 "A student recital" Parkside's Fine Arts Divi; i, presents a "Student Recital" Sunday, April 25, at 7:30 p.m St. Mary's Lutheran Church Kenosha. Featured at the rec will be Shirley Grothe (organ piano), Patricia Peder (piano), and Judith Lei (soprano). They will be assis by Tom Turkowski (piano) Marjorie Roth (flute). The ] formers are students of Carol i (piano), Martha Dodds (voi< Glenda Mossman (organ), , August Wegner (composition) The public is invited to recital and to the reception fellowship Hall, immediat iollowing the recital. •'•My- . - Thursday, April 22,1982 Photo by Mark Sanders CLASSIFIED ADS Intramural Serviced Offered TYPING— Professionally done. Reasonable rates. North Kenosha. Call anytime 551-7438 or 658-9229. Help Wanted LAWNSKEEPER AND GARDENER for semi - la rge estate. Must have references and own transportation. Very North Side of Racine. If interested contact Karen in the Ranger office. Salary negotiable. WANTED: Students to sell advertising for Ranger. 15%commission and bonus. Here's the perfect chance to make $$$$. Stop in Ranger office (next to Coffee Shoppe) if interested, WANTED: News, feature and sports writers, photographers, graphic artists. Stop by Ranger office. Wanted ROOMMATE NEEDED, after graduation. Wood Creek, 552 9175 D ick O WANTED: Chess players for the chess club. Contact Gary at SOC. FOR SALE LASER SAILBOAT w/trailer, 14 ft. Olympic class, exc. cond. $1400, 639 6635. 1979 Y AMAHA DT 12S Excellent condition. Make offer. 637 5085 FILM - THEATRE - S HAKESPEARE BOOK SALE THRU MAY 5. Quality used and out of print books at the Old Book Corner at Martha Merrell's Bookstore, 312 - 6th St. Racine. Also, to celebrate Shakespeare's birthday on April 23, a selection of prints and engravings from the 18th and 19th centuries. Over 1200 used books in all areas for sale. Personals BIG PARTY — Apt. #107 P arkside Village, Saturday the 24, 9 o'clock. ANNETTE — Please leave note same place this weekend. Jeff. HARPO — If you had any brains you'd be in science. HARPO — feeble - mi nded should not talk of the feeble • m inded. CHUCK — What's it like to have tunnel • vision? CHUCK — Are you really as stupid as your articles? CHUCK — Want to buy some earrings? .CHUCK — Are you going to live on Welfare like most Humanities Majors? CHUCK — Liberal Arts won't get you a iob. CHUCK — Please give your hair back to your poodle, his teeth chatter at night. SUE: Happy #32. Thanks for the friendship through the years! TO: Participants in A Student Music Recital; the recital was nothing less than wonderful. TO ALL CHUCK AND HARPO WRITERS: ESAD. If you can't argue opinions in telligently, shut the -•-• up! B-ball Photo by Kim Schlater KENOSHA VETOSPORT sponsored a bike training race on inner-loop road last Sunday. There will be another race this Sunday. Interview with G. Gordon Liddy . . . Well, excitement filled the gymnasium last Sunday when Parkside held their annual Intramural Basketball Championships. The four teams that vied for the coveted crown of intramural basketball, only two made it to the finals, the Parkside "Super Cocks", and the "Five Neat Guys". This left the two other teams (the "Gunners" and "The Lords") out in the dust. The "Super Cocks" took an early lead in the game, and the "Five Neat Guys" just couldn't seem to cut it, even though there were valiant attempts. The "Super Cocks" won it 68-59. The high scorer for the "Super Cocks" was Dan Sykes with 25 points, closely followed by Paul Charapata with 19 points. Other players for the Super Cocks were: Kevan Bytnar, John Vocino, Glenn Lowe, Rich Salisbury, Dick Oberbruner and Mike Brinen. Congratulations "Super Cocks"! Bike for M.D. Well, it's time to dig that bicycle up and out from the basement and get it in working order. Greg Scarlato and Chuck Neustifter have already done just that, and they have even planned their first trip of the season. The two intend to bike for two weeks across Wisconsin for Muscular Dystrophy (MD), starting on June 1. Although the exact route has not yet been plotted, they plan to go 60 miles a day, traveling on mostly county highways through the central part of the state. Scarlato and Neustifter are presently looking for people to join their excursion, and they are also looking for sponsors. Should they raise $500 or more, they will get to present a check to Jill Geisler on Channel 6 television. The trip is not, in the words ofi Scarlato, "for softies." There will be no support vehicle, and each particpant is expected to carry his or her own equipment. They will be camping overnight in state parks. Anyone interested should call Greg Scarlato at 657-5714. FIRST National Bank of Kenosha DOWNTOWN MAIN OFFICE AUTO BANK 24 HOUR TELLER BRISTOL PLEASANT PRAIRIE SOMERS Phone 658-2331 MEMBER F.D.I.C. STUNNING STYLES HAPPEN HERE 3519 52nd St. Kenosha, Wl 654-61 54 3532 Meachem Rd. Racine. Wi Iair Studio 554-8600 i'REDKEN Salon Prescription CenterContinued From Page Three call diminished returns. And it no longer makes sense. Q.: How did you manage to go to nine different prisons and get out after only 4-1/2 years? A.: In one prison, where I lasted only five months, I was accused by the associate warden and the press of intimidating 450 convicts into a strike which shut the prison down. That was an exaggeration. Yeah, I did very well in those prisons. I was in one prison where the murder rate was one every 90 days. I got thrown out of that prison — they believed I was too dangerous. They could not cope with me. I forced them to release me (from solitary confinement). There was nothing I couldn't do in prison that I didn't want to do — nothing. You get out of solitary confinement by bringing a writ, which you write on toilet paper because you're smart enough to know what to say. Q.: Do you have any regrets about anything you did — other than getting caught? A.: I certainly regret ever having involved myself in that or any other enterprise with the likes of Dean and Magruder. Next time I would certainly recruit a more heartier crew. Q.: Is that the only regret you have? A.: Exactly. Q.: Do you shoot guns anymore? A.: I'm not supposed to — (but) I shoot a lot. I really don't pay much attention to those rules. I'm just very careful what I'm doing. Q.: Do you think your success shows that crime does pay? A.: Firstly, if crime didn't pay, would there by any crime? Secondly, if someone does something and you disagree with it, you consider it a bad example, what is the compulsion to emulate him? If you don't like it, don't do it. Q.: Do you ever cry? A.: No. Q.: Do you have any emotions? A.: Yes. Q.: Not negative emotions, but positive emotions? A.: Oh sure. It's tremendously thrilling to me to get behind the controls of a high performance aircraft. I live a very interesting and full life, believe me. I have lots of joys and happiness. Q.: Are the major joys and happiness derived from having power, such as the aircraft. A.: Oh, that's one of them, but it's not the power of it — it's controlling all that power. I can make it do anything I want. Q.: Is that what you enjoy the most — power? A.: What I enjoy pretty much the most is being in bed with a beautiful woman. Q.: Does that mean your wife? A.: No comment. Q.: What is your annual income? A.: Very large — I don't even know. Q.: How many zeroes? A.: Lots of them. Before all this happened I was working for the government. I think anybody will tell you you'll never make any money for the government. The most I ever made with the government was 30 (thousand) dollars, back in the days it would be equivalent to about $50,000 today. You can't make any money working for the government and you won't make any money working for somebody else. RACE DATE RPRIL 28 TOO REGISTRATIOA RPRIL 20 &21 moLinflRo concouRse sponsored bi| SkprnaHpsiiett 8 Thursday, April 22,1982 RANGER TEAM SALES — ALL SPORTS • 'itows • MM • PUMA • PONY • SONVERtc • SPOT-SUIT • 9AUC0NY • SPALDING • N£W BALANCE MOM-W. 10AO AJH. - S.-00 P. •AT 1000 AM. • IOO P M. CIOMD KNDAVS A HOLBA> The Active AiWetet One Stop 694-9206 THIS ENTIRE PAGE GOOD FOR 10% DISCOUNT ONE (1) WEEK AFTER DATE OF ISSUE, SALE ITEMS EXCLUDED. 5935 - 7th Avenue Kenosha, Wisconsin 414-658-4861 7535 Pershing Blvd. Kenosha, Wisconsin 414-694-1380 4235 - 52nd Street Kenosha, Wisconsin 414-658-0120 8035 - 22nd Avenue Kenosha, Wisconsin 414-657-1340 410 Broad Street Lake Geneva, Wisconsin 414-248-9141 24726 - 75th Street - Rt. 50 (Paddock Lake) Salem, Wis 414 - 843-2388 CALL OR STOP IN FOR DETAILS 5Vi% Interest Iff Yo ur D aily Balance is $500.00 or Mere! LENDER WE'RE HERE TO HELP YOU OROWI Baseball Men delayed by cancellations, lose to Carthage ON TAP AT UNION SQUARE Parkside's best hitting came from third baseman Rich Salisbury. In the second inning, Salisbury hit a double and then scored on a two base error. At this point Parkside led 1-0, but Carthage tied it up in their half of the second. In the fourth inning, Parkside again took the lead when Rich Salisbury led off with a double. Mike Carey knocked in Parkside's second run due to a shortstop error. Other hits made for Parkside were by shortstop Kevan Bytnar, second baseman Dan Sykes and outfielder Dick Sykes. Parkside kept a 2-1 lead up until the Carthage half of the eighth inning. The Redmen scored six runs on only five hits in order to win the game. Mark Schmitz and Scott Hartnell pitched in relief for Parkside. Schmitz was the losing pitcher. It is clear that Parkside played a much better game than Carthage up until that dreaded eighth inning. With a little more power hitting, perhaps Parkside could have come back to make the score a bit more even. Last Monday, Parkside hosted Milton College for a double - header of which the second game was called due to rain. The first game, though, resulted in more bad luck for the Rangers. They were defeated 3-0. Only seven innings were played because it was to be a double - header. Pitcher Joe Krisik went the distance for the Rangers, but unfortunately was not backed up by his hitters. Second baseman Dan Sykes, outfielder John Hyatt and third baseman Rich Salisbury provided Parkside's only three hits of the game. Milton College looked real good, scoring twice in the third inning and once in the sixth. They had a total of three stolen bases, one of which resulted in a run. There is no excuse for Parkside's recent defeats except poor hitting. Unless they can learn to hit and to take advantage of their opponents' errors, there are going to be many more losses in the future. FREE CHECKING! ATHLETIC FOOTWEAR SUPER SPORTS u FOR ALL SPORTS FOOTWEAR, ETC. M FAST. M-MOUU EMORAVMQ MflVtCS "Parkside STILL Has Style" Softball Women now 6-3 by Kathleen Pohlman The women's softball team had a busy and successful week last week. On april 12 they played away against Lewis University and came home with a double victory. The first game ended at 7- 3 with Lynn Barth as winning pitcher. Bonnie Schmelter batted 2 for 3 including a triple with bases loaded. In the second game Michele Martino was the winning pitcher which ended 2-0. After two wins the Rangers played Stevens Point and lost. The score was 3-1 and although all three pitchers pitched, Paula Sandahl received the loss. The Rangers were scoreless until the seventh inning when Lynn Barth doubled and was brought home on an error. Bonnie Schmelter hit another good game and ended up 2 for 4. On April 15 the Rangers split a doubl e hea d e r a g ain st Whitewater, losing the first 1-0. Barth was the losing pitcher. The second game the Rangers got their chance to prove their talent, winning 3-2. Michele Martino pitched a one - hitter, keeing the game tied until the fourth inning. Nancy Kivi played a mean game of defense catching a fast line drive and picking off the woman on first. Friday's game was rained out, giving the team a rest before the St. Xavier Tournament on Saturday. The first game of the day was against George Williams of Downers Grove. Even with the cold and strong winds they came out the winners in the 12th inning, 8-7. Michele Martino was the winning pitcher. The Rangers were down until the sixth inning, but with Nancy Kivi's two triples and (Hie single along with Paula Sandahl's triple and single the women ended victoriously. The second game was against St. Xavier which also ended in victory; l-o. Lynn Barth pitched a one - hitter. Janet Broeren played a nice game of defense. The winning run came when Lynn Barth singled and Bonnie Schmelter sacrificed to advance Lynn. Kathy Tobin's hit resulted in an error on St. Xavier's part, driving in Lynn. Needless to say the Rangers became the winners of the tournament for the second year in a row. The women's record is now 6-3. The next game they play is another tournament, the Chicago Circle Tournament in Chicago on the 23rd and 24th. by Tammy Shuemate After cancelling five games due to the recent weather situation, the Parkside baseball team finally had a chance to play last Thursday. Unfortunately, the Rangers played Carthage, who somehow managed to pull out a 7-2 victory. Throughout the first seven innings, Parkside held the advantage and showed some fine pitching by Joe Krisik and Brian Steinhoff. Krisik, who pitched the first three innings, allowed only four hits and one run. Steinhoff, who had an excellent outing, allowed only one hit, no runs and struck out five of the nine batters he faced. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource The Parkside Ranger, Volume 10, issue 27, April 22, 1982 Description An account of the resource Student newspaper of the University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Kenosha, Wis. Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1982-04-22 Subject The topic of the resource College student newspapers and periodicals Student publications University of Wisconsin-Parkside--Newspapers Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource Newspaper Language A language of the resource English Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant Kenosha, Wisconsin Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available University of Wisconsin-Parkside Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource The Board of Regents of the University Wisconsin System g. gordon liddy policy development sexual harassment sexual harassment advisory committee stella gray wayne johnson