https://archives.uwp.edu/files/original/8eca591895d51aa9b88485b666fd4be0.pdf 299768763b8f3fad3564e057dca0881a Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource University of Wisconsin - Parkside Ranger News Description An account of the resource Student newspaper of UW-Parkside Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Issue Volume 4, issue 8 Headline Used for newspapers, the Headline element describes the main article of the issue. Guskin outlines plans for involvement in community Series Number The series number of the original collection. UWPAC124 Ranger News Text Any textual data included in the document Guskin outlines plans for involvement in community by Kurt Larson Since coming to Parkside, Chancellor Alan Guskin has frequently spoken in favor of increasing Parkside's involvement with the community. Until now, he has said relatively little about how he intends to accomplish this. In a recent RANGER interview, Guskin enthusiastically revealed some of his hopes and ideas on this subject. "I think one critical function of the University is to upgrade the quality of life in the community." he said. "I would like to see Parkside become a cultural center for people living in Racine and Kenosha counties." Part of Guskin's tentative plan for achieving this goal is an increase in the number of c ultural events taking place at Parkside, particularly on weekends. He said he is considering making Parkside's "magnificient" facilities available to the local "starving artist's" fairs. He also mentioned the possibility of a socalled "music circus" that would consist of simultaneous performances by numerous university and local musical groups. Guskin said he likes the idea of inviting such prestigious regional organizations as the Milwaukee Repertory Theater and the Chicago and Milwaukee Symphonies to perform here. Though he admits that such performances would be expensive, Guskin said that money from ticket sales would pay for "a large portion" of the cost. Another possible means of bolstering Parkside's community relations that Guskin mentioned, "going out and educating people where they work." He said that this has already been done successfully with a "couple of business courses," and that he would like to see the program expanded to include liberal arts courses as well. Eugene Norwood, Dean on the School of Science and Society, said that this has already been done in the College with courses in Industrial Psychology and Advanced Chemistry, and will probably be done again in the future. Guskin also said that he favors rearranging courseschedules in a way that will premit people who work during the day to complete a major by taking night courses exclusively. Under the present system, most courses are not offered at night. This makes pursuing an education extremely difficult for students who are unable to attend classes during the day. Work half complete on new Union and greenhouse by Mike Palecek Progress reports on the Union, a new Modern Industry building, and several other ongoing projects were given by Jim Ga Ibraith, director of planning and construction to the Campus Planning Committee. In addition, the committee advised the chancellor to form a committee to handle appeals in traffic and parking violations on campus. The Student Union, said Ga Ibraith, is currently about 40 percent complete. The building is scheduled to be totally enclosed by December 1. If this is done, and the building is heated throughout the winter, the Union should be completed by July, 1976. The report states "while the budget was slightly overtaxed at the time bids were taken, we have adjusted the funding by delting a few more non-essential excesses and are now in the process of a dding back essential items." Ga Ibraith explained this by saying, "We have an architect on the project with a strong sense of design, who pledged that his additions would not go over the budget." He went on to say that in the bidding, these additions did go over projected costs, and nonessential items had to/ be sacrificed. Greenhouse complete in spring The greenhouse, the other structure being built on campus at this time, has its first phase 55 percent completed, according to continued on page 3 The Parkside Wednesday, Oct. 22 THl PARKSIDE RANGER IS A SIUDENT PUBLICATION OE THE UNI VERSITY 0 1 WISCONSIN - PARKSIDE Vol. IV No. 8 Economic situation blamed for Board's money demands by Mike Palecek The Kenosha County Board asked the state to pay back the $2.1 million that county residents paid for the 700-acre Parkside campus at their monthly meeting October 7. Sup. Wayne Kossl, who introduced the resolution, said the state has not lived up to its commitments to the community and the whole state should share in the cost of the land. Assemblyman Russ Olson (RBassett) called this move "purely economic" and said "at least on behalf of some of the board members it was sincere. I can't blame them for trying, but I wish they would have tried about 10 years ago." In 1967 Ols on introduced a bill in the legislature to have the state pay the land costs for Parkside. At that time, Olson stated, the county "wrote a blank check" in bidding for the current site. Olson stated, "I think the county board was disappointed that the University acted as greedily as they did. I think they would have been happier with a different site. The Pet Springs site was close to Kenosha, so the County Board still had to stick close to the bargain. The Board didn't think we'd get involved so deeply financially. No one ever dreamed the University would choose the site they did." Olson added, "If the county board had not spent money, the University still would have been COP starts research, will J ni\ersity s future continued on page 6 /erstegen The Committee of P rincipals is functioning. Faculty can relax; attempts are being made to dissuade any feelings of paranoia. But, at this time, student input will be limited to survey samples. Only one student sits on a COP sub-committee. Why "principals" rather that "principles"? This is the gathering of "university stars" as one member put it. Four senior administrators and six members of the University' Committee comprise the "Principals." The main vehicle for information input will be surveys and at least a half-dozen are planned. Some may find numberous surveys bothersome, inconvenient and repetitive but the committee feels there is no other way to get the scope they need to make their recomphoto by Mike Nepper Amazing Randi did another amazing thing. He got a standing ovation last Wednesday night from an annreciative audience. Getting out of a straitjacket, straining and redfaced, was great; the disappearing radio, was fantastic; but Randi's most amazing feat was his rapport with his audience. He almost charmed the pants off them. Children's work featured A display of art work by children from Jamaica will be on exhibit in the Comm Arts Gallery through Oct. 27. The show reveals the close relationships between the children's art and the physical environment in which they live as well as how the young child's imagination deals with the personal and cultural situation in which he finds himself. Gallery hours are 3 to 5 p.m. Mondays, Wednesday and Fridays and 6 to 8 p.m. Tuesdays and Thursdays. Enrollment drops as Center suffers financially built, with state money, at the Pets site. The proponents were hysterical and afraid to take that risk." Olson reasoned that "when the wheels of a bureaucracy are in motion," as in the case of the Parkside purchase, the money usually comes. Olson also said that the battle between the University of Wisconsin and Wisconsin State Colleges would have encouraged UW to acquire Parkside. There were several other sites proposed for Parkside. These were the Kenosha two-year campus (now Kenosha Alternative High School), Racine's two-year campus (now Gateway Tech-Racine), and the abanmendations for direction. Surveys depend on the unbiased, unthreatened responses of those queried. Assurances were given that faculty surveys especially, would be done anonymously and not be included in personnel files. Not all groups are recruiting students but they may volunteer. Chancellor Guskin, cochairman of the Committee, continued on page 3 by Jeannine Sipsma The Parkside Day Care Center has financial problems which arose with its move this year to the University-owned Sublisky House, the Chancellor's conference house on Cty. Tk. E. Financial problems seem to be reaching the critical point. Gail Navratil, director of the Center, said, "If nothing comes our way in the near future, we may face closing." The Center, which began in 1972 as a small operation occupying the basement of Parkside Baptist Church, grew into a rather impressive organization by 1974, when it was located at the Kenosha Campus. At t his point the enrollment was 117 children and it occupied several large rooms, two of which were converted into a nursery for children under two years. The Center was more heavily supported by the University at this time and the Center did not pay rent, for janitors, or general paper supplies. The Kenosha Campus was closed, and the Center was forced to move by March 1975, and then, it seems, the problems began. It now rents the University-owned Sublisky House. The rent comes to $111 per month, which is a small price for the size and quality of t he home, but it's still $111 more than they paid in previous years. The home is fine for the average-sized family, but its utility as a day care center remains questionable. The house is described by Navratil as having a disquieting effect on the children because of the lack of space. Because of its size and nature, different rooms of the house are organized for specialized activities and the children are rotated from room to room to participate in the various activities. Navratil is planning to divide the house into three selfcontained classrooms in order to approximate the typical day care center which usually occupies one large room divided up into specialized areas. She said the typical set-up is better because it gives children a Stronger sense of security, saves the time of rotating groups, and makes the scheduling of activities more flexible. Because of its more limited space, the Center is now licensed for 35 children per hour, compared to the 48 p er hour which was allowed at the Kenosha Campus. The enrollment has dropped to 76 children this year as compared to 117 during the spring of 1974. The Center found it necessary to discontinue its nursery operation and now accepts children only between the ages of 2 and 7 years. Financial problems have been encountered because of the unique nature of the service, said Navratil. The Center caters to students who only require the continued on page & 2 THE PARKSIDE RANGER Wednesday, Oct. 22, 1975 Faculty play politics in ignoring students The work groups of the Committee of Principals, even at this early stage of formation, appear to have taken respective political positions. . For the faculty, the first step is to alienate the students, then complain that students aren't interested and won't respond. All six work groups have met at least >one time, and members say that student involvement in the groups has been on the agenda. Yet, after all the talking, the most that has been done is one letter from one work group to PSGA asking for student names. As of this writing, no student organizations, including RANGER, have been contacted to help in the recruitment process. Students who left their names on the special interest forms at registration have not been contacted either. One chairperson didn't know students were to be involved; another group, which has one student on it, has indicated that they have no intention of recruiting more than that one; and other group chairpersons spoke in vague terms of sleepless nights spent in desperate, earnest thought as to how to involve students. A RANGER staff member gave his name as a volunteer to two committees and hasn't heard a word from either. RANGER was originally under the impression that the Committee of Principals was important in that after research and surveys, major decisions would be made which would greatly effect the University's future. But instead, it's another group comprised almost totally of faculty, who figure that Merger Law 36.09 (5), "students shall formulate and review policies affecting their lives," is of no significance to our lives as students at Parkside. For those groups which say over the telephone that yes, students are welcome but none has been contacted, and to those groups who pretend they have made genuine efforts to recruit students, and to those who suggest "we wait until we are together and organized" before desiring students, RANGER suggests having low expectations regarding student interest. RANGER apologizes for its sports headlines in last week's paper where at one point we wrote that our women's volleyball squad was "loose" to Carrol and Carthage Colleges, and again, on the same page wrote that the soccer team was "loose" to Platteville. The word "loose" has many meanings. However, we intended none of them. What us English majors was trying to say was that both teams had some bad luck and lost. Neither the soccer team nor the volleyball are having particularly successful season, but that, by no means necessitates either team being "loose" to the opposing team in order to do better. As we all know, there is more to lose when we are loose. RANGER would rather have losing athletic teams than loose losing teams. Board action is blackmail The recent action of the Kenosha County Board regarding the refund by the state of $2.1 million that county residents have paid for our 700-acre Parks.de campus is best described as a face-saving device by a generation of politicians in need of a face-lift. No binding legal contract was extracted from the state with reference to the development and expansion of Parkside programs. Because of this, it is clear that the interests of Kenosha-area taxpayers were sublimated, through sloppy negotiation, to the demands of grandstanding statesmen and state bureaucrats with edifice complexes. Now, any case presented by Kenosha public officials, necessarily rests on the argument of "good faith" agreements between the county and the state. RANGER believes that the nature of t he tenuous legal claims of the Kenosha County Board leaves Parkside open to a game of bureaucrats' blackmail; that is, the state can withhold further expansion and development of Parkside, awaiting disposition of Kenosha's claim. Furthermore, the identification of the Parkside area as that of a troublesome community, could serve to halt needed expansion and development. Kenosha politicians, you missed the boat once. Don't put our University up for ransom. Let our campus go. To the Editor: I would like to convery my sincerest appreciation for the outstanding manner in which the Ranger delivered our message concerning club elections to the student body in the Oct. 15 issue. I am glad that you did not confuse our election notice (which we have only once a year) with a notice about an organizational meeting (which we have only once a semester) or with a notice about a gaming session (which we have only five times a week). It is nice to know that the Ranger can be depended on to handle such a difficult task on the few occasions that we really need it. It is instances such as these that reveal that it is the truly great journalistic prowess of the editor and staff that makes the Ranger what it is today. After all, it must be tremendously difficult to read an elections notice and then so adeptly print "such-and such a club will meet..." Gratefully yours, Mark Mulkins, President, Parkside Association of Wargamers Editor's Note: Unfortunately, the notice came in two days after our deadline. In order for Ranger to leave proper space, organizations must meet the Thursday deadline for event notices. This deadline is stated at the bottom of the EVENTS column. Wednesday, Oct. 22: Films in Skeliar from 11:30-12:30p.m. Wednesday, Oct. 22: Psychology Club meeting at 1:30 p.m. in WLLC D174. Wednesday, Oct. 22: Student concert at 3:30 p.m. in CAT. Thursday, Oct. 23: Bus trip to Chicago Ski Show. Meet at 4 p.m. at Tallent Hall, bring $1 for bus. Thursday, Oct. 23: Lecture, "Women in the Third World Countries. Africa, Latin America and China" at 8 p.m. at Carthage College. Free. Thursday, Oct. 23: Third World meeting at 2 p.m. in WLLC D174. Elections will be held. Friday, Oct. 24: "Fall Ball on the Belle" weekend in Louisville, Ky. Info and sign-up at Student Life Office WLLC D197. Friday, Oct. 24: Student recital, Jean Tashoff on piano at 7:30 in CAT Saturday, Oct. 25: Cross country, Carthage Invitational Meet at at 11 a.m. Saturday, Oct. 25: Soccer, Parkside vs. East Michigan at 2 p.m. at the soccer field. Saturday, Oct. 25: Women's swimming, Parkside vs. UW-Milwaukee at 2 p.m. in PE Bldg. Sunday, Oct. 26: Guest recital: Richard Piippo, cello Gertrude Stillman, harpsichord; at 3:30 p.m. in CAT Tuesday, Oct. 28: Women's volleyball Parkside vs. UW-Waukesha at 4 p .m. in PE Bldg. ' All items lor the EVENTS column must be submitted to tne RANGER office, WLLC D'194 on or before the Thursday prior o publication THE PARKSIDE EEEEEE The PARKSIDE RANGER is written and edited by the studen for^ite^diter alnoH'' SC0I \ Sin - Parkside th*y are solely respon; U W Parkside K ^ h content - Offices are located in D194 W1 , enosha, Wisconsin 53140. Phones 553-2295, 553-; Acting Editor: Debra Friedell Feature Editor: Mike Palecek Sports Director: Thom Aiello Events Column: Judy Trudrung Business Manager: Ann Verstegen Ad make-up: Diane Werwie W r ite ^ D i n e f e l < » er D o n z e l l H o l t O r i n T a v l o r Writers Jeanmne Sipsma, Steve Smith, Leigh Feifer red Johnson. Mick Anderson, Betsy Neu Jim Rit?rNi' hT' Catherine 81ise> Bruce Wagner Rita Nicholas, Kurt Larson Photographers: Dave Daniels, Al Fredricksen Gordon Mclntos construction separate building, to be projected with additions to make it a $4.5 million complex (in 1975 dollars), rhis facility could have additions depending upon demands. The second plan would call for the $1.4 million to be spent for an addition ot the current Classroom Building, where the School of Modern Industry is currently housed. The committee spoke primarily in favor of the latter plan, at this early discussion atage, but noted that some political overtones are in favor of the first plan. Plans for color teveision a communication system hookup with Milwaukee's Educational Television Network were described. A library Learning Center hookup system to library carrels will be bid on October 22 and the Milwaukee System hookup will be constructed over the summer of 1976. There were also reports on the exterior and interior sign systems, with the problem of not providing enough information to the infrequent visitor to Parkside, as well as discussions on the proposed safety improvements of the intersection of Hwy. E and JR. Also mentioned was the fact that funding for the landscaping of the parking areas was n ot approved by the State. However, monies have been set aside for the other projects. p MOLBECK'S ^ GROCERY Complete Line of Quality Groceries Specializing in ^HEALTH F OODS-DIETETICS -IMPORTSy LVjy 1304 Grange Ave Phone 633-7769 continued from page 1 opened the meeting by reading two-pages from comments made by Harold Dennison, president of Ohio State University, on creative planning. Guskin's implied challenge through quotes from Dennison was "are we going to take a Cook's tour and be very precise or are we going to have the nerve and courage to take a Lewis and Clark expedition and adventure into the unknown?" After the lengthy reading, Bill Murin, associate professor of Political Science and copchairman of the Committee, thanked Guskin for the opening prayer and went on to business at hand...reports from group chairpeople. Only three groups out of six had met and presented reports of their intentions, Instructional Methods and Innovations Work Group chaired by assistant prof, of education Thersa Peck; Student Population Group chaired by director of career planning, Jack Elmore; and Program Development chaired by Benjamen Greenebaum, associate professor of physics. In conjunction with a professional research lab in Madison, Elmore's Student Population group plans to survey attitudes both internally and externally. They hope to find whether assumptions now made about students are correct and through planning what groups the University could recruit that are not reached presently. Peck's gorup, Instructional Methods and Innovations Work Group, will compile, through surveys, information on teaching methods, retraining programs, computer applications and capabilities and courses directed to new target groups. One committee member disliked the word "innovative" and though it might bias results from the start. Weh faculty are surveyed on their teaching methods it is hoped that the word "innovation" or innovative techniques will not be found threatening by respondents. Greenbaum' s Program Development Group will also be surveying to find academic ambitions and to develop new ideas for programs and curriculum. They will be looking nationwide at traditional and non-traditional model programs to determine successful attempts elsewhere. Some groups may combine their surveys even thought their questions may have different thrust. The COP will meet again in two weeks. In January, when the efforts of COP culminate; when surveys and information jell together into the big picture, possibly we will have a map down the yellowbrick road, Parkside's Lewis and Clark adventure. ."OR RENTTToorTuppeTTldrTdiTlTwaiT" carpet, off street parking. Dual entrances. No pets, older person or teacher. Call after 4.564 1803. WANTED: roommate. Two bedroom 'PPer flat at 1935 56th Street, Kenosha. $62.5 mo. plus utilities. Fully furnished, larg- <itchen and living room, off street parking Call Steve 652 1436 after 3 p.m. weekdays Female roommate wanted to move in Nov. 1st. Located near campus. Rent is $95, deposit $50. Two bedrooms, carpeted. More information by calling 552-7054 after 5 p.m. WITH THIS G0UP0N Classifieds REPAIR WORK -- dishwashers, garbage disposals, washers, dryers, etc. Call evenings Al. Stendel 886 3865. ANY NEW RELEASE, Si.aB b.P S $7.98 TAPES 0NbY$4.29 0NbY$5.4G ONE SWEET DREAM 5010 7TH AVENUE KENOSHA EARN UP TO $1800 a school year or more posting educational literature on campus in spare time. Send name, address, phone, school and references to: Nationwide College Marketing Services, Inc., P.O. Box 1384, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106. Call (313)662 1770. CHICKEN STEAKS SEAFOOD CHOPS PIZZA LASAGANA RAVIOLI MOSTACCIOLI GNOCCHI SPAGHETTI SANDWICHES BOMBERS HAMBURGERS BEER SOFT DRINKS WINES Northside 3728 Do uglas 639-7115 Southside 1816-16th St. 634-1991 PICK UP OR PIPING HOT FOODS DELIVERED TO YOUR HOME ©ORADO UWP Soccer Club Presents GET DOWN TONIGHT" • Add ice to a mixing glass or jelly jar, depending on your financial situation • Pour in 2 oz. of Jose Cuervo Tequila. • The juice from half a lime. • 1 tbsp. of honey. • Shake. • Strain into a cocktail glass or peanut butter jar, depending on your financial situation. SPEED READING Sduca/ionct/ jVeceMity • 7 Week Course e Professional Instructors eMoney Back Guarantee • All Materials Included • Financing Available • Reasonable Rates STUDENT-TEACHER DISCOUNT FOR AN Saturday, October 25 9 p.m. - 1 a.m. Student Activities Building The building is located south of Tallent Hall Tickets will be sold in advance for $1.00 and at the door for S1.50. Tickets are available from Soccer Club members or Coach Hal Henderson, and at the P.E. office Open to the Public Wisconsin I.D.'s Required FREE MINI-LESSON r6aM 258-6630 IOSE CUERVO* TEQUILA. 80 PROOF. IMPORTED AND Bi LED BY <© 1975, HEUBLEIN, INC., HARTFORD. CONN. 4 TNF PflRKSIDE RANGER Wednesday, Oct ??, 1975 Student Disciplinary Guidelines Report Of The President of the Board Resolution: That, upon recommendation of the Senior Vice President of the UW System, the Board of Regents approves a delay in the final action on the Student Disciplinary Guidelines under the following time schedule and assumptions: 1. Central Administration and the Board of Regents will receive further recommendations for specific amendments to the draft Guidelines stemming from the testimony received at the public hearing on June 20, 1975, with such recommendations to be submitted, in writing, on or before November 1, 1975 t o the Office of Academic Affairs, 1668 Van Hise Hall, University of Wisconsin System, c-o Associate Vice President Adolph Y. Wilburn. 2. During the first semester, 1975-76, institutional student governments, associations, or other organizations interested in the Guidelines will work with campus administration and the faculty in developing discussions directed toward interpreting and clarifying the meaning and implications of the Guidelines. 3. Amendments received shall be reviewed by Central Administration and representatives of the committee developing the draft Guidelines, and that recommendations for the incorporation or other disposition of amendments received shall be prepared for the Regents, and 4. Final action by the Regents on the Guidelines will be scheduled for the January, 1976 meeting of th e Board of R egents, with opportunity for discussion provided at the time of final action. Unless an extension of time has been requested and received from Academic Affairs. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE UWS STUDENT DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES THAT ARE RECOMMENDED BY CENTRAL ADMINISTRATION 17.02 DEFINITIONS Sec. 17.02(4) 1. In line 24, after "misconduct," insert: written reprimand, denial of particular University privileges. 2. After line 25, i nsert as final sentence in the paragraph: Each campus is authorized to adopt a more explicit listing of sa nctions which are consistent with the provisions of this section. Comment: These suggestions are prompted by our belief in the fairness of a policy of maximizing the explicitness of sanction provisions. Sec, 17.02(8) This is amended to read as follows (the new matter identified by underlining). "Academic response" means a formal action which may be taken by an instructor under Sec. 17.13(2) (c) in response to 'academic misconduct" as defined by Sec. 17.06(2). It is to be distinguished from "sanction" or "disciplinary sanction" as defined in Sec. 17.02(4). It is limited to (1) reduction of grade for the assignment or examination in question to a lower passing grade (if it is clear that the academic misconduct affected only a portion of the assignment or examination and the remainder constituted passing work) or to a failure, and (2) required performance of additional work - for example to resolve uncertainties over the effect of the academic misconduct on the assignment or examination. Comment: 1. The first part of the new matter seeks by cross-references to clarify the nature and role of the "academic response" which is a new concept and will be puzzling without this additional help. 2. The second part (in parenthesis) makes explicit when a reduction to a lower passing grade is permissible. 3. The third part illustrates the non-punitive nature of the "additional work" requirement. (We have been against using academic grades and requirements as punishment.) 17.06 OFFENSES DEFINED Sec. 17.06(l)(c) 1. In examples 2 and 3, the period at the end should be changed to a comma, and the following clause added: Under circumstances where the student knew or reasonably should have known this would occur. In Example 4, line 12: insert "intentionally" before the word "obstructed." Comment: These changes merely bring the language of t he examples into conformity with the language of the main text of paragraph (c). » 2. In Example 5 line 15: insert "parts of" before the word "Other." lines 16,17,18: substitute "them" for "the materials." Comment: The change in line 15 makes clear that the prohibition is not confined to "pages." The other change avoids the possible reading that "materials" in these lines excludes books. Sec. 17.06(l)(f) Should read: For acts of violating and provisions concerning parking, traffic, I.D. Cards, University keys, drugs, smoking in unauthorized places, carrying firearms, unauthorized peddling, unauthorized use of sound-amplifying equipment, and other subjects covered by the published University of Wisconsin System Administrative Code. Comment: Insofar as possible the student should be informed of the precise acts which will subject him to discipline. A mere reference to the Administrative Code is not enough. What is needed is an accurate succinct summary of the . Code prohibitions. If that is not done, then at least some notice of the Code subject matter should be conveyed. Sec. 17.06(l)(g) Should read: For making a knowingly false statement, either orally or in writing, to any University employee or agent on .a University-related matter. Comment: This change avoids punishment for (1) a statement which is believed to be false but is not actually false, and (2) a statement that is not on a University-related matter. Sec. 17.06(2) (g) Should read: Knowingly and intentionally assisting another student in any of the aboveincluding assistance in an arrangement whereby any work, classroo m perf orm anc e, examination or other activity is submitted or performed by a person other than the student under whose name the work is submitted or performed. Comment: This reinstates the "assisting" offense which seems to have been inadvertently dropped from the present Code on academic dishonesty, and incorporates the substitute performance situation as one example of s uch "assisting." 17.0 7 D I S C I P L I N A R Y PROCEDURE Sec. 17.06(3) 1. Substitute the following for lines 17 and 18: (3) Informal adjudication. To expedite the handling of less serious cases, the Chancellor may, after consultation with the elected committee which serves as the faculty's executive arm, and with the elected officers of the principal student organization, adopt the following informal system: If the maximum penalty sought by the investigating officer (whose adjudicatory functions under this paragraph may be discharged by a tribunal authorized to do so by campus regulations) does not include suspension or expulsion, the officer may; 2. In line 25, add after "and": of the penalties that may possibly be imposed, 3. At the end of this main paragraph (p.8, line 3), add: The final decision shall be communicated to the student in writing. Comment: The substitute (1) attempts to incorporate some faculty and student input before a less than full hearing procedures is adopted for the less serious cases; (2) recognizes the possibility that a particular campus may wish to have a tribunal rather than the investigating officer be the adjudicator; (3) enhances the notice and communication aspects of the informal procedure. Sec. 17.07 (3 )(b) For this subparagraph substitute the following: The student who is dissatisfied with an informal adjudication may within 10 days of receiving notice of the decision take a written appeal to the Chancellor, who shall afford the student or his representative, as well as the other side, a chance to present oral argument. The Chancellor's decision shall be final. In cases where the Chancellor believes a testimonial hearing is necessary, he may refer the case for hearing either to the student conduct hearing tribunal which shall proceed in accordance with Sec. 17.09(4), or to such other hearing body as may be established by regulations promulgated by the Chancellor after consultation with appropriate students and faculty; the decision of the student hearing tribunal or the hearing body shall be final, notwithstanding the provisions of Sec. 17.10 and 17.11. In such a case, any sanctions imposed by the tribunal or the hearing body shall be less than suspension or expulsion. Comment: This change (1) gives more detail on the nature of the appeal to the Chancellor from informal adjudications, and (2) adds the possibility of the Chancellor's referring the case for full hearing. The latter is a compromise between a system which affords no full hearing at either the trail or appeals level and a system under which a student can demand a full hearing even in the less serious case. Sec. 17.07(5) On page 9, the sentence beginning line 3 and ending on line 5 should be deleted. Comment: We are opposed to taking away credit for academic work already completed, and for an entire semester. Since the diploma can be withheld pending decision on the charges, the would-be graduating senior can have his right to the diploma suspended for one or more semesters thereafter-and this would have sufficient punitive effect. 17.08 STUDENT CONDUCT HEARING TRIBUNAL, CAMPUS OPTION Sec. 17.08(1) The first two lines of text should read: The Campus Student Conduct Hearing Tribunal may be constituted by the Chancellor, after consultation with the elected Committee which serves as the faculty's executive arm, and with the elected officers of the principal student organization, in one of two ways: Comment: The change is to insure input from faculty and students on the Chancellor's decision concerning the nature of the Tribunal. 17.11 INTERMEDIATE APPEALS, CAMPUS OPTION Sec. 17.11 The first two lines of text should read: (1) The Chancellor of each campus, is authorized but not required by this section, after consultation with the elected Committee which serves as the faculty's executive arm, and with the elected officers of the principal student organization, to establish appellate tribunals. Comment: This change is to insure faculty and student input on the Chancellor's decision concerning tribunals for intermediate appeals. UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM STUDENT DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES CHAPTER UWS 17. UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM. STUDENT DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES CHAPTER UWS 17. 17.01 POLICY STATEMENT. The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System adopts the following policy on the standards and procedures for student discipline in the University System, acknowledging both the need to preserve the orderly processes of the University with regard to its teaching, r esearch, and public service missions, as well as the need to observe the student's procedural and sub stantive rights. 17 02 DEFINITIONS. (1) "Chancellor" where used in the chapter shall mean the chancellor or his designee. (2) "Investigating officer" means in vestigating officer or his designee. (3) "Student," for the purposes of this chapter, means any person who is registered for study in a ny institution in t he University for the current academic period. A person shall be considered a student during any period which follows the end of an academic pe riod which the student has complet ed until the last day for registra tion tor the next paid for by PSGA te en (14) calendar days have elapsed afte r the commencement of cl asses for the next succeeding academic period, whichever occurs first. (4) "Disciplinary sanction" or "sanction"' shall mean any action affecting the status of an individual as a student which is taken by the University in response to student misconduct. The term shall include probation, resignation or leave for misconduct, cutt off or revocation of student financial aids, suspension or expulsion, removal from the course with no grade assigned in cases of academic misconduct, and other less severe actions not enumerated herein. Disciplinary sanctions do not include academic responses as de fined in sec. 17.02(8). (5) "Probation" rpeans that the student is permitted to remain enrolled in the University only upon condition that he comply with all University rules or regulations or with other standards of conduct which the student is directed to observe for the duration of the period of the probation and which may include loss of student privilege s except those of attending classes and writing examinations. Probation may not exceed two semesters in duration for any given misconduct, except that violation of probationary conditions shall be cause for extension of the probation for more than two additional semesters or for suspension or expulsion. (6) "Suspension" means a temporary loss of student status for a specified period of time, not to exceed two years, with resultant loss of all student rights and privileges. Upon completion of suspension, the student shall have the same standing to re-enroll as he would have had if no suspension had been imposed. (7) "Expulsion" means termination of student status with resultant loss of all student rights and privileges. (8) "Academic response" means formal actions which may be taken by an instructor in response to academic misconduct. Such actions are limited to reduction of grade for the assignment or examination in question (to a lower passing grade or to a failure), required performance of additional work, or some combination thereof. (9) "Instructor" for the purposes of this chapter means the faculty member who has responsibility for the overall conduct of a course and ultimate responsibility for the assignment of the grade for the course. 17.03 RIGHT TO PETITION FOR READMISSION. A student who has been expelled or suspended may petition for readmission. The petition must be in writing and directed to the chancellor of the campus which initiated, the charges for which the student was suspended or expelled. Such petition may. not be filed before the expiration of one year from the date of the final determination in expt/lsion cases, or before the expiration of one half of the suspension period in suspension cases. 17.04 EFFECT OF DISCIPLINE WITHIN THE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM. Suspension or expulsion shall be syst emwide in effect. A student who is s uspended or expelled from one institution in the University of Wisconsin System may not enroll in another institution in the System unless the suspension has expired by its own terms or one year has elapsed after the student has been suspended or expelled. 17.05 SYSTEMWIDE DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY. The chancellor and investigating officer for the institution at which a student was enrolled at the time that acts in violation of this chapter were alleged to have been committed by the student shall have authority to institute disciplinary proceedings against such student, notwithstanding that the institution against which the acts were alleged to have been committed is not the same institution at which the student was enrolled at the time of the commission of such acts. 17.06 OFFENSES DEFINED. (1) The University may discipline a student in nonacademic matters in the following situations. For the purposes of this section, the term "intentional conduct" shall include conduct which the student knew or reasonably should have known would result in occurrences prohibited by this section. (a) For intentional conduct that seriously damages or destroys University property or attempts to seriously damage or destroy University property. (b) For intentional conduct which constitutes a serious danger to the personal safety of other members of the University community. In order to illustrate the types of conduct which this paragraph is designed to cover, the following examples are set forth. These examples are not meant to illustrate the only situations or types of conduct in tended to be covered. 1. A student would be in violation if h e attacked or threw rocks or other objects at law enforcement personnel whos e services had been retained or called for to protect membe rs of the University community or University property, or if he incited others to do so when he knew or reasonably should have known that such conduct would result. 2. A student would be in violation if h e sold or delivered a controlled substance as de fined by the Wisconsin Uniform Controlled Substances Act (ch. 161, Wis. Stats.) or if h e possessed a controlled substance with intent to sell or deliver. For the purposes of this example, possession of amounts of controlled substances larger than are likely to be consumed by one individual in one week, possession of several hypodermic needles or other equipment commonly used for con sumption of controlled substances, or possession of a substantial quantity of bags or other containers for repackaging, or other . c h e r "icals commonly used for mixing with controlled substances, would constitute prima facie evidence that the student in tended to sell or deliver the controlled substance in his possession. For the purposes of this section "delivery" shall be defined as a delivery prohibited by ch. 161, Wis. Stats. 3. A student would be in violation if h e removed, tampered with, or otherwise rendered useless University equipment or property intended for use in preserving or protecting the safety of members of the University community such as fire exit signs, extinguishers, alarms, or hoses, first aid equipment, or emergency telephones, or if h e obstructed or caused to be inoperable fire escape routes such as stairwells or elevators. (c) For intentional c onduct that obstructs or seriously impairs or attempts to obstruct or seriously impair University-run or University-authorized activities on any campus, including activities either outdoors or inside a classroom, office, lecture hall, library, laboratory, theater, union, residence hall, or other place where a University-run or University-authorized activity is carried on. The kind of intentional conduct referred to is conduct which by itself or in conjunction with the conduct of others prevents the effective carrying on of the activity—a result which the student knew or reasonably should have known would occur. In order to illustrate types of conduct which this paragraph is designed to cover, the following examples are set out. These examples are not meant to illustrate the only situations or types of conduct intended to be covered. 1. A student would be in violation if he participated in conduct which he knew or should have known would prevent or block physical entry to, or exit from, a University building, corridor, or room to anyone apparently entitled to enter or leave in connection with a University-run or Universityauthorized activity. 2. A student would be in violation if, in attending a speech or program on campus sponsored by or with permission of the University, he engaged in shouted interruptions, whistling, derisive laughter, or other means which by itself or in conjunction with the conduct of others prevented or seriously interfered with a fair hearing of the speech or program. 3. A student would be in violation if in a classroom he used techniques similar to those specified in the preceding paragraph, or filibuster-type tactics or other tactics, which by themselves or in conjunction with the conduct of others, prevented or seriously interfered with the carrying on of the teaching and learning process. 4. A student would be in violation if he obstructed a University official or employee engaged in the lawful performance of his duties. 5. A student would be in violation if he or she removed pages from library books or other materials or caused books or materials to be unavailable for use by others by removing the materials from their proper place without proper authorization or by hiding the materials in the library so that they are not available in the usual manner to persons wishing to use the materials. (d) For conviction by a court of a crime, or of violation of a municipal ordinance based on a crime, if the crime or other offense (i) involved the use of (or assistance to others in the use of) force, disruption, or the seizure of property under the control of the University, (ii) was committed with intent to prevent employees or students at the University from engaging in their duties or pursuing their studies, (iii) was of a serious nature, and (iv) contributed to a substantial disruption of the administration of the University. )e) For unauthorized possession of University property or property of another member of the University community. (f) For acts which constitute a violation of any provision of the University of Wisconsin System Administrative Code. For making a knowingly false statement, either orally or in writing, to any university employee or agent on a university-related matter. (2) The University may discipline a student for academic dishonesty. Academic dishonesty includes the following examples as well as other closely similar conduct aimed at making false representation with respect to a student's academic performance. (a) Cheating on an examination; (b) Collaborating with others in work to be presented, contrary to the stated rules of the course; (c) Plagiarizing, including the submission of others' ideas or papers (whether purchased, borrowed or otherwise obtained) as one's own; (d) Stealing examination or course materials; (e) Falsifying records, or laboratory or other data; (f) Submitting if contrary to the rules of a course, work previously presented in another course; (g) Participating in any arrangement whereby any work, classroom performance, examination or other activity is submitted or performed by a person who is not the same student under whose name the work is submitted or performed. 17.07 DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE. (1) The chancellor of each institution shall designate a person as "investigating officer" who shall investigate cases of student conduct alleged to be in violation of Sees. 17.06( 1) and 17.06(2) of this chapter. Where it appears that a violation has occurred, the investigating officer shall proceed in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. . (2) Formal adjudication. If the maximum sanction sought by the investigating officer includes suspension or expulsion, the procedures in sec. 17.09 of this chapter shall apply and the investigating officer shall cause a statement of charges to be prepared and served upon the student involved. The statement of charges shall contain: (a) A concise summary-giving dates, time, place, and events--of the facts or conduct on which the charge is based. (b) A citation to and quotation from the rule(s) alleged to have been violated. (c) A statement of the maximum penalty sought by the investigating officer. (d) An explanation of the consequences of failure to answer the statement of charges. (e) Statements as to whether the ad ministrator will or will not be represented by counsel and that the student may be represented by a person of his choice, in eluding legal counsel, at his own expense. (f) A copy of this chapter. (3) Informal adjudication. If the maximum penalty sought by the in vestigating officer does not include suspension or expulsion, the investigating officer may adjudicate the matter and 'mpose appropriate disciplinary sanctions without reference to sec. 17.09 of this chapter, except that if adjudication in this manner would result in disqualifying the student for financial aids, the procedures in sec. 17.09 shall apply. In adjudications under 'his section, the student (i) may be represented by a person of his choice, in- .eluding legal counsel, at his own expense. <ii) shall be afforded written notice of the offense with which he is charged and of the facts or conduct on which that charge is based and (iii) shall be afforded advance written notice of and an opportunity for a hearing at which the evidence against the student shall be reviewed and at which the student shall have an opportunity to present evidence and argument, including a written statement, to refute the charge. The evidence reviewed at such a hearing shall be summarized in writing and preserved by the mvestigating officer as part of the student's disciplinary file. asSH,: informal adiud.cation, or after a statement of charges has been served but prior to a hearing provided in accordance wi°h sec sssress?* Wi?h th1\ S. f deems appropria te consistent with the statement of charges; provided however, the student may, within ten (10) days a,,er receiving notice of the imposition of such sanction, request a hearing as provided by sec. 17.07 of this cnapter. limit' m°VhL nKt C° n l ained in this chapter shall stMHolt H administration and the student during an investigation of alleged misconduct, during informal adjudication, or after a statement of charges has been theul f 9 ' 66 ,0 9 disciplinar V sanction if nL h ?. a9rees not t0 con,est 'he charges IhLlf k n ° con,es, " ) - Any such agreement ^„nL 1 r6dUCed t0 writin9 which ' ^hen signed by the student, shall conclude the case. (5) Whenever charges or appeals under this chapter are pending, a student under charges, unless temporarily suspended pursuant to sec. 17.12 of this chapter, shall continue to have the same rights and privileges accorded other students However, grades, records, transcripts, or diplomas may be withheld pending final determination of the charges; current !. ranSCrip,S may be issoed with the notation Disciplinary Charges Pending" on the face thereof. (6) Service of notice or decisions. Each student shall be responsible for maintaining on file with the office specified by each in stitution his current school and permanent home addresses. Notification of these ad dresses shall be in writing. (a) For service of a statement of charges under sec. 17.07 (2) and of actions taken pursuant to sec. 17.09, copies shall be served in person or by certified, return-receiptrequested mail to both the student's campus and permanent home address. Where service is by mail, the date of mailing shall be the date of service. (b) For informal adjudications pursuant to sec. 17.07(3), correspondence and notices may be served in person or by mail to the student's campus address. Where service is by mail, the date of mailing shall be the date of service. 17.08(1) STUDENT CONDUCT HEARING TRIBUNAL: CAMPUS OPTION. The Campus Student Conduct Hearing Tribunal may be constituted in one of two manners: (a) A hearing examiner appointed by the chancellor upon the filing of charges under sec. 17.07(2) asking suspension or expulsion. The hearing examiner shall be appointed from among qualified personnel of the various state agencies or other qualified residents of the state with experience in conducting hearings. If an examiner is an employee of a state agency other than the University, his appointment must be approved by the head of the agency by which he is regularly employed, and the University shall reimburse such agency for the salary of the examiner and shall pay expenses incidental to his duties for the University. The examiner remains the employee of the agency by which he is regularly employed. The appointment of the hearing examiner from other state agencies shall be in compliance with sees. 1 .24 and 20.901, Wis. Stats, (1971) If the examiner is not an employee of a state agency other than the University, appropriate arrangements for compensation and reimbursement for expenses shall be made by the chancellor; or (b) A student Conduct Hearing Committee established in accordance with the chancellor's published regulations. The presiding officer of the Committee shall be appointed by the chancellor. (2) Campus disciplinary procedures promulgated by each campus chancellor, after consultation with appropriate students and faculty, pursuant to this chapter shall provide for a campus Student Conduct Hearing Tribunal either as constituted in sec. 17.08(1) (a) or as in sec. 17.08(l)(b); however, in the alternative, the chancellor may provide in the campus disciplinary procedures that, upon the filing of charges under sec. 17.07(2) asking for suspension or expulsion, the student shall be offered the choiceof having his case heard by a tribunal described by either 17.08(l)(a) or (b) above. If such option is available, the student shall be informed in writing of his right to choose the type of tribunal at the time charges are filed. At the time a request for a hearing is made under sec. 17.09(1), the student shall also notify the chancellor of his choice; in the event timely notice is not received from the student, the chancellor shall decide which choice shall be used for- adjudication of the case. 17.09 DISCIPLINE INVOLVING SUSPENSION OR EXPULSION. (1) A student charged in accordance with section 17.07(2) has ten (10) calendar days from the day of service to request a hearing in accordance with this section. The request for a hearing shall be in writing directed to the chancellor and shall also include an answer to the statement of charges which shall specifically admit, deny, or explain each of the facts alleged in the statement of charges unless the student is without knowledge in which case he shall so state, such statement being a denial. If an answer is filed which doesnot specifically admit, deny, or explain every allegation in the statement of charges, those allegations which are not admitted, denied, or explained shall be deemed denied. An answer which denies some or all of the allegations but which does not request a hearing shall be construed as a r.equest for a hearing. (2) If the student does not file an answer to the statement of charges in accordance with sec. 17.09(1), the allegations ir. the statement of charges shall be accepted as true and the administration may proceed to expel, suspend, or impose other punishment on the student unless good cause to the contrary is shown. The sanction imposed may not ex ceed that specified in the statement of charges. Notice of such action shall be served on the student and become effective upon service in accordance with section 17.07 ( 6). (3) When a request for a hearing is made, the case shall be referred by the chancellor to the Student Conduct Hearing Tribunal established in accordance with sec. 17.08 of this chapter. Notice of referral to a Hearing Tribunal shall be sent to the student. The student shall also be notified of the name and addressof the person who will present the administration's case to the Tribunal. (4) Hearing, procedure. (a) In this section, "presiding officer" fn!i m,tT„ ,he hearir|9 examiner appointed th» s. L <' > (a), or the presiding officer of «Lki ? Conduct Hearing Committee, established in sec. 17.08(l)(b). "Tribunalshall mean the hearing examiner appointed in sec. 17.08(1)(a) or the Student Conduct 17 08 r<aHb) :Ommi,tee es,ablished in sec (b) Duties of the presiding officer. '- Take custody of the case file and papers. 2. Schedule hearings in accordance with these rules. 3. issue subpoenas and administer oaths. Rule upon offers of proof and receive relevant evidence. 5. Regulate the course of the hearing, dispose of motions, procedural matters or requests, and, if appropriate or necessary, order the investigating officer to commence disciplinary proceedings against students who unreasonably obstruct or impair the Tribunal's proceedings in its presence, 6. Schedule filing of briefs and proposed findings by the student and the administration. 7. Produce a summary of the evidence. 8. Take any other actions necessary to conduct the hearing. (c) Duties and powers of the Tribunal. Individual members of the Tribunal: 1. May challenge any ruling by the presiding officer and may, by majority vote, overrule such ruling but such matters unless otherwise convenient should be decided in closed session. 2. Shall, by majority vote, render written findings of fact, decision, and disciplinary sanction which does not exceed that specified by the statement of charges. 3. May examine witnesses. (d) Evidence. Evidence having reasonable probative value shall be admitted, but irrelevant, immaterial and unduly repetitious evidence shall be excluded. The presiding officer and the Tribunal are not bound by cmoon law or statutory rules of evidence. (e) Burden of Proof. The burden of proof shall be on the administration to establish by a preponderance of the credible evidence that conduct violative of University rules occurred. (f) Issues: Prior Criminal Proceedings. Where the basis of the charge is conduct for which the student has been convicted in criminal proceedings, the administration may introduce a certified copy of the judgment of the conviction. The judgment of conviction shall constitute presumptive evidence of the commission of those acts alleged and proven in the criminal proceedings. (g) Record of the hearings. A record of the testimony and a file of the exhibits shall be made of all hearings conducted in accordance with this section. Either party may, at its own expense, have the record transcribed. (h) Procedural rights of the student. The student shall have the right to confront and cross examine witnesses against him, the right to present evidence and to be heard on his own behalf, the right to be represented by counsel at his own expense, and the right to a transcript of the proceedings at his own expense. (i) Public hearings. Hearings to receive evidence or hear argument shall be public unless the student whose case is being heard requests a closed hearing or the Tribunal determines in extraordinary circumstances that it is necessary to hold a closed hearing, pursuant to sec. 66.77 (3)(3), Wis. Stats., to avoid unduly damaging the reputation of innocent persons. A record shall be made of the reasons for closing any hearing. The deliberations of the Tribunal shall not be public. (j) Schedule of hearings. The presiding officer shall schedule the hearing as expeditiously as possible. The hearing shall be held on the date scheduled, except for good cause shown. (k) Failure to proceed. Failure of a party to proceed shall constitute default. The Tribunal may either dismiss the charges, or , upon a prima facie showing, find that the student committed the conduct alleged. (1) Decision. 1. The tribunal's decision shall be rendered in writing within ten (10) calendar days after the close of the hearing, or within ten (10) calendar days after a written transcript is. available if one of the parties requests a transcript pursuant to sec. 17.09(4)(g), and shall consist of a summary of the evidence, findings of fact, decision, and specification of the disciplinary sanction which does not exceed the specified in the statement of charges. 2. The Tribunal's decision shall be served on the student in accordance with sec. 17.07(6) and on the chancellor's office. 3. The Tribunal's decision shall become final ten(10) calendar days after service on the student unless a timely appeal is filed pursuant to sees. 17.10 or 17.11 of this chapter. 17.10 APPEAL TO THE BOARD OF REGENTS. (1) The student or ad ministration may appeal on the record to the Committee on Student Discipline of the Board of Regents. Said appeal must be filed within ten (10) calendar days of service upon the party of the decision appealed from and shall consist of written exceptions to the decision's findings of fact, decision, or disciplinary sanction. (2) Upon receipt of the appeal and written exceptions, the Secretary of the Board shall transmit the written exceptions to the chairman of the Committee and shall cause the person with custody of the decision(s), file, exhibits, and transcript or recording of the hearing(s) to transmit them to the chairman of the Committee. (3) If exceptions are filed under sec. 17.10(1), the Committee shall afford the parties an opportunity to file briefs and present oral argument. (4) The Committee shall render written findings of fact, decision, and disciplinary sanction which does not exceed that specified by the statement of charges. (5) The Committee's decision shall become final upon service upon the student in accordance with sec. 17.07(6). (6) The Board of Regents reserves jurisdiction to review, upon its own motion, any disciplinary action against a student. Wednesday, Oct. 22, 1975 THE PARKSIDE RANGER 5 17.11 INTERMEDIATE APPEALS: .CAMPUS OPTION. (1) The chancellor of each campus is authorized, but not required by this section, to establish appellate tribunals as part of the campus student disciplinary procedure to hear appeals from decisions rendered in accordance with sec. 17.09. Such tribunals may include review by (i) an all student, student faculty, or all faculty committee, and or (ii) review by the chancellor. (2) An appeal to an appellate tribunal must be filed within ten (10) calendar days of service upon the party of the decision ap pealed from and shall consist of written exceptions to the findings of fact, decision, or disciplinary sanction. (3) The parties shall have an opportunity to file briefs and present oral argument. Appeals shall be heard as soon as practicable but no later than seven (7) calendar days after the written exceptions are filed in accordance with sec. 17.11(2)'. (4) A record shall be made of appellate tribunal proceedings. (5) Appellate decisions shall be rendered within five (5) calendar days of the hearing and shall consist of a summary of the evidence, written findings of fact, decision, and disciplinary sanction which shall in no event be more severe than the sanction imposed by the Student Conduct Hearing Tribunal. (6) Appellate decisions shall become final ten(lO) calendar days after service upon the student in accordance with sec. 17.07(6) unless a timely appeal is filed either under this section, if further appeal is available, or under sec. 17.10. (7) The chancellor shall promulgate and publish written appeal procedures which are not inconsistent with this chapter. (8) The student shall have the right at any time to appeal to the Regents in accordance with sec. 17,10. Intermediate appellate proceedings shall be terminated, immediately upon the appellate tribunal's receipt of notice from the student that an appeal to the Regents has been filed. 17.12 TEMPORARY SUSPENSION. (1) A student may be temporarily suspended by the investigating officer pending final action on the charges against him if his continued presence on campus would constitute a potential for serious harm to himself or to the safety of other members of the University community or of University property. Except as otherwise provided in sec. 17.12(3), the student shall be afforded an opportunity for a preliminary hearing prior to imposition of the temporary suspension. In order to illustrate the types of conduct which warrant temporary suspension, the following examples are set forth. These examples are not meant to illustrate the only situations or types of conduct intended to be covered. (a) A student who was arrested and charged with possession of controlled substances with intent to deliver was discovered to have large quantities of LSD, heroin, methamphetamines, or barbiturates in his university dormitory room. (b) A student who was arrested for throwing a fire bomb into a University classroom building. (c) A student who assaulted another student in the student union was arrested for engaging in conduct regardless of human life. (d) A student whose behavior was judged by a psychiatrist to be psychotic, posing a threat to the safety of himself or others. (2) Before a temporary suspension may be imposed, the investigating officer shall make an initial evaluation of the reliability of the information received and make such further investigation as circumstances permit. If the investigating officer concludes that the conduct alleged warrants temporary suspension of the student, he shall notify the student of his intention to temporarily suspend him and, at the earliest practicable opportunity, provide the student with an opportunity to be heard. (3) The investigating officer shall maintain records of all attempts to notify the student in accordance with sec. 17.12(2), and, if all reasonable efforts to notify the student are unsuccessful, the investigating officer may impose the temporary suspension without a preliminary hearing, provided, however, attempts to notify the student continue, and the student is afforded a preliminary hearing at the earliest practicable opportunity. (4) Preliminary hearing. (a) The preliminary hearing shall be held as soon as practicable. (b) At the hearing, the student shall be given a statement of charges as required by sec. 17.07(2) (a) and (b) and a summary of the reason(s) for concluding that the alleged conduct warrants temporary suspension. (c) The issues shall be limited to con sideration of the reliability of the evidence against the student and whether the alleged conduct warrants temporary suspension. (d) The investigating officer's decision may be rendered orally but shall be con firmed in writing, as soon as practicable. The decision must be supported by credible evidence which is sufficient to indicate that there is probably cause to believe that the student engaged in the alleged conduct and that such conduct warrants temporary suspension. (5) Appeal. The decision of the in vestigating officer may be appealed in writing to the chancellor who shall, as soon as practicable, afford the student an opportunity to be heard. (6) Accelerated hearing. The hearing on the charges as required by sec. 17.09 of this chapter shall be commenced not later than fifteen (15) calendar days after the im p sition of the temporary suspension unless the student requests a delay of the hearing and continuation of the temporary suspension until a later date. 17.13 PROCEDURES FOR ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT. (1) The faculty and chancellor, in consultation with appropriate students, shall by written regulation establish procedures for adjudicating alleged violations of sec. 17.06(2). Such regulations shall provide for an initial conference and a hearing before an Academic Misconduct Hearing Tribunal whose procedures are not inconsistent with the provisions of this section. (2) Initial conference; student enrolled in course. (a) When the instructor for a course believes that a student enrolled in that course has committed acts in violation of sec. 17.06(2), the instructor shall promptly schedule an initial conference with the student in accordance with this section. The purpose of the conference shall be to review the evidence against the student and to review the evidence and argument presented by the student in his or her defense and to review the appropriateness of the academic response and or disciplinary sanction which may be imposed by the in structor if, after the conference, he or she believes that the student has violated sec. 17.06(2). The instructor and the student may each be accompanied at the initial conference by one person of their choice. (b) Notice. Reasonably in advance of the initial conference, the instructor shall inform the student in writing of the alleged offense and of the facts or conduct on which that allegation is based. The student shall be Informed of the date, time and place of the initial conference. This notice shall be served on the student in accordance with sec. 17.07(6) (a) and shall be accompanied by a copy of this chapter and a copy of the institution's implementing regulations. (c) Academic response or disciplinary sanction imposed by the instrucotr. The instructor may give the student a written reprimand and-or remove the student from the course; if the instructor believes that the student should be considered for more serious disciplinary sanctions, the instructor may request the Investigating officer to proceed in accordance with sec. 17.07. The instructor may also impose an academic response if the student's own academic performance was affected by the academic misconduct. An academic response may not be imposed where the student's own academic performance was not affected such as in the following instances: (i) the student assisted another student to engage in academic dishonesty, or (ii) the student tole copy of an examination and the theft was discovered before the exam so that the student did not take the exam. In such cases, if the student is enrolled in the course, the instructor may impose the disciplinary sanctions permitted by this section or, if the student is not enrolled in the course, refer the matter to the investigating officer. (d) Instructor's decision. 1. If, after the initial conference, the instructor believes that the student has not violated sec. 17.06(2), he or she shall so inform the student in writing. If the instructor believes that the student has violated sec. 17.06(2), he or she shall Inform the student of his or her decision in writing with a copy to the investigating officer; such decision shall be served in accordance with sec. 17.07(6) (b) and shall include (i) a full explanation of the facts on which the instructor's conclusions were based; (ii) specification of the disciplinary sanction or academic response imposed; )i'i) further action in the case, if any, which the instructor has recommended to the investigating officer; and (iv) notice that the decision may be appealed to the Academic Misconduct Hearing Tribunal. (3) Offenses committed by a student not enrolled in the course. When the instructor for a course believes that acts which violated sec. 17.06(2) have been committed by a student not enrolled in the course he or she shall refer the matter to the investigating officer who shall proceed in accordance with sec. 17.07. (4) Appeal from the instructor's decision. The instructor's decision may be appealed to the Academic Misconduct Hearing Tribunal either as to the issue of whether the student did engage in conduct as alleged or as to the disciplinary sanction. Appeals shall be in writing and must be filed with the office or person designated by the campus regulations within ten (10) days of service of the instructor's decision; while such appeal is pending, the academic response and-or disciplinary sanction shall be stayed and no grade assigned for the course. If the student does not file an appeal within ten days of service of the instructor's decision, the instructor's decision shall become final. (5) Academic Misconduct Hearing Tribunal. (a) Membership. Tribunal membership shall be determined in accordance with the regulations adopted pursuant to sec. 17.13(1), (b) Jurisdiction. The Tribunal shall hear appeals under sec. 17.13(4) and such other allegations of violation of sec. 17.06(2) as may be brought before it by the investigating officer. (c) Procedures. Tribunal proceedings shall be regulated by the same procedures established by sec. 17.09 for Student Conduct Hearing Tribunal, except that: For cases where the sanction sought does not include suspension or expulsion, the chancellor's regulations may provide for procedures which are less rigorous but which provide at least that the student (i) may be represented by a person of his or her choice, including legal counsel, at his or her own expense, (ii) shall be afforded written notice of the offense with which he or she is charged and of the facts or conduct on which that charge is based, (iii) shall be afforded advance written notice of and an opportunity for a hearing at which the evidence against the student shall be reviewed and at which the,student shall have an opportunity to present evidence and argument, including a written statement, to refute the charge, and (iv) shall be given a written decision which shall include finding of fact and conclusions. 2. The sanction imposed by the Tribunal may not exceed the sanction imposed by the instructor unless the case is being heard in accordance with sec. 17.13(6) (b), in which event it shall not exceed the sanction requested by the investigating officer; further, the Tribunal may not modify the academic response imposed by the in structor unless the Tribunal finds that no violation of sec. 17.06(2) occurred, in which event the instructor shall eliminate any academic response which was based on the alleged academic misconduct. (6) Role of the Investigating Officer with regard to academic misconduct. The in vestigating officer: (a) Shall receive and maintain copies of letters sent by instructors in accordance with sec. 17.13(2)(d) 2. (b) May proceed in accordance with sec. 17.07, including the filing of charges before the Academic Misconduct Hearing Tribunal asking for suspension or expulsion. 1. Where the student alleged to have violated sec. 17.06(2) was not enrolled in the course against which the offense was committed. 2. Where the violation found by the instructor was of such an aggravated nature that disciplinary sanctions which could not be imposed by the instructor appear to the investigating officer to be warranted and not more than sixty (6) days have elapsed from the filing of the instructor's decision pursuant to sec. 17.13(2)(d) 2. 3. Where there are multiple instances shown of a student's academic misconduct and not more than sixty (60) days have elapsed from the filing of an instructor's decision pursuant to sec. 17.13(2) (d) 2 on the last instance. paid for by PSGA 6 THE PARKSI DE R A NGER Wed nes day , O c t. 2 2 , 1 9 7 5 economics — continued from p a ge 1 doned Bong Air Base at Hy. 142 and 75 in Kenosha County. Olson pushed for the Bong site, primarily because of the disappointment of his constituents that hundreds of persons were displaced when the land was condemned, and that the area remained unused when the air base was abandoned. Olson stated that preliminary work at the Bong site was finished, there were some sewage set-ups, highways, excavation, and foundations laid. The already state-owned land would not have cost the taxpayers any additional amount. Jim Galbraith, director of Planning and Construction at Parkside, was in favor of th e Pet Springs site. Galbraith spoke of the sprawling metropolitan area and the need for future lands being set aside for an uncrowded university. He gave the example of the Madison Campus, which in 1904, a speaker told an astonished audience, that enrollment would reach 5,000 students. The current enrollment is in the 30,000s. Galbraith said that current projections show that Parkside may some day reach 25,000. "We were planning a campus that could reach that number. At the time, growth was projected greater than it now is expected, but Parkside has still continued to grow." Galbraith stated that Parkside is the only campus in the System which has gained students every year in the last three years. The land west of Hy. JR is not being used in an active way very much, Galbraith said. It is being used in a passive way by allowing it to revert back to its original state. Parkside has to be one of the most beautiful campuses in the state," Galbraith said. In the future, Galbraith said he envisioned the campus as a buffer zone, and currently as a longterm investment in the future and the community. Child Care Center continued from p a ge 1 service for several hours only on certain days, and this creates problems in scheduling. The business is sporatic, with some hours of the day being filled to maximum and some falling far short of maximum enrollment. The service was opened to the general public this fall with the hope of ge tting some full or parttime users but it was hard to schedule for full days when certain hours were already scheduled for the maximum amount of children. Students are being urged to schedule children for four-hour blocks of time to help alleviate the problem. Navratil describes the Center as a business whose first priority is to break even. Right now, the service is operating at a deficit, with expenses for 1975 exceeding income by $569. The Center lost $180 last month alone. Navratil said, "If we're going to meet students' needs, we need a consistent source of funding." At the present time the Center depends largely on the fees charged for child care ($2.50 per four-hour time block). Among other things, this money is used to pay for rent and the salaries of workers. Personnel receive no benefits and are reliant on customers to pay fees on time in order to draw their salaries. The Center, which is listed as a student organization, is eligible to receive segregated fees which amount to $1,700 th is year. Rent alone comes to $1,332 per year, and segregated fees may not be used for this purpose. Navratil stressed, though, that the Center is very thankful for this allotment. At present, the Center is trying small projects like last week's bake sale in order to stay in existence. Navratil says of the Center, "I think we're providing a very vital service and, without it, some students wouldn't be able to go to school." 12 nd National Greenbay Rd., Kenosha IMP®RT N\@T@RSI OF RACINE, INC. B.M.W. - MERCEDES BENZ - SAAB FIAT - SUBARU 1914 M ™ 4 door sedan-front wheel drive, radial tires, and radio. Tops in economy, low in price '2595 1970 SAAB 99E It's what a car should be. Fuel Injection, front wheel drive, radial tires, and more. Great commuter car! *1895 TIM DARREY 5913 DOUGLAS AVENUE RACINE. WISC. B3402 RACINE 639-9555 Free Pitcher of Pabst with a family size pizza With this coupon Offer ends Oct. 29, 1975 Brat Stop Highway 50 and 194 Friday and Saturday Union free admission Friday to U.W. Parkside students with school l.D. Free checking...Free checks* No minimum balance FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE...EXTRA BANKING HOURS. Our entire office including lobby and drive-in Monday-Thursday 7:00-5:30 OPEN: Friday 7:00-8:00 Saturday 8:00-Noon f t I At the intersectio n of Highways 11 and 31 I ZHeritmRank - Rleasant C * S l "i i or c all for d etails. 6125 Durand Avenue • Racine, Wisconsin 53406 Phone 414-554-6500 MEMBER OF THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION "HALLOWEEN SALE" Oct. 23 thru 31 Party Costumes for all ages wigs - hats 49c - *1.49 1950's & 60's clothing Noise makers -- masks -- etc. 10 - 29c Children's Costumes - - 39c - 59c •••••••••••••••••••••A* Handy Man's Corner For Hard to Find items check this area Electric Motors Sinks T.V. Tubes Lighting Fixtures Jeans — Books — Warm Clothing GOODWILL B UDGET STORE Elmwood Plaza - Racine Hours: Daily 9-9, Sat. 9-6, Sun. 11-5 Parkside Activities Board invites you to the BRECKENRIDGE COLORADO WINTER SKI FESTIVAL Jan. 2-11 ^A. Includes: • Round Trip Bus Fare ^ v. • Lodging (4 to a room) ^ • Parties • Lift Tickets :5\ ma jrii '10 OFF if you sign up before October 24 One bus filled, less than forty seats available Sign up in room D-197 WLLC The best jobs come toSnelling&Snelling. km J; m if B\t'' ** H [Ai22 Your first job can be meaningful and your chances of finding the right job are better at Snelling and Snelling. Because employers who are looking for people who are look«,g for a challenge, come to us to find them. Stop in or Call PNAIIinm 0 II* ® Where New Futures Begin. . .\||P||||||| A\||Q||||]f| uimimmim World's 2031 22nd Ave., Vi Kenosha, Wis. (414)552-7 Largest V Employment Service V " a Capri Plaza, 53140 350 ANHEUSER-BUSCH. INC. » ST, LO UIS d-«" fr °" r or THE VVORUO .HENOWNEE BudweiserO ,%& •: "ACER^EEH ,.V V Budweiset BRANDT'S OPEN THURSDAY EVENINGS MONUMENT SO., D OWNTOWN RACINE Harriers finish 3rd in look to Carthage Inv. Kv Thftm Al'alln 111. by Thorn Aiello In the tough Northern Illinois Invitational held in DeKalb, 111., the Parkside cross-country team finished third, with 94 points. The meet, held last Saturday, was won by North Central College (111.), with 35 points. North Central is the number one team in the NCAA Division III. Second place belonged to Northern Illinois, with 43 points. The top runner for the Rangers was Ray Fredericksen, the outstanding sophomore, with a time of 26:24, which was good for third place overall. The remainder of Parkside's runners were: Jeff DeMatthew, 19th place; Curt Spieker, 22nd; Greg Julich, 24th; Jim DeVasquez 26th; Mike Rivers, 30th; and Jim Heiring, who finished 34th. PnaoK VI/. n.jt . , aid, "I Parkside soccer player Steve Sendelbach had his heart in the right place as well as his head in the recent game against Marquette. Soccer team ties by Bruce Wagner Parkside played without four starters against Marquette but managed to play one of their finest first halves defensively. However, Parkside managed to score one goal as they tied the Warriors, 1-1, in Milwaukee. Those four starters were suspended following the Platteville match for conduct unbecoming a player, leaving the Rangers with a limited bench. This second tie of the season puts Parkside at 34-2 and with the preceding loss to Platteville, may put the Rangers out of the tournament picture. didn't figure we could beat North Central," and finishing third was probably the Rangers' most "realistic" hope, though Godfrey wished his squad could have done better point-wise. Godfrey commented that the course was a tough one for the Rangers, saying, "We got hurt badly because of the wind." This Saturday the Ranger runners will compete in the Carthage Invitational, to be held at Petrifying Springs at 11 a.m. Of the meet, Godfrey said, "I think we'll run better," Knowing the course should work in Parkside's favor, although Godfrey said the meet will be the largest and, probably, the "strongest" of the year for Parkside. There are currently 14 teams listed to participate, with Western Michigan and Northwestern the clear-cut favorites. Also expected to run strong are Luther College (Iowa) and Stevens Point, who Parkside has already beaten this year. Godfrey said, "We certainly would like to be in the top three, but realistically, we'd like to be among the top five." Next Tuesday, Oct. 28, the Rangers will run at Loras College (3p.m.). Godfrey said, "Over the years, Loras has been very strong," but this year they are "down." The only exception to being "down" for Loras is Chuck Korte, their top runner who has been an All-American. When you say Budweiser,you've said it all! Wednesday, Oct. 15, 1975 THE PARKSIDE RANGER 7 \ Gordon's Auto Parts, DISCOUNT TO STUDiNTS Phone 632-8841 1214 Lathrop Ave. Phone 6 37-8882 1406 M ilw. Ave. Distributed by E. F. Madrigrano 1831-55th Kenosha. t/VI BICYCLE SALE 1 0% OFF ALL BIKES an d ALL BIKE ACCESSORIES WITH THIS VALUABLE COUPON! TOWN & COUNTRY BICYCLES 1647 Taylor Ave. Racine, Wis. 634-3009 OPEN MON.-FRI. 10 a.m. - 8 p.m. SAT. 10 a.m. - 6 p.m. CLOSED SUNDAY TEXAS INSTRUMENTS & ROCKWELL CALCULATORS AT BRANT'S, R ACINE Rockwell 61R ADVANCED TI-25504 FUNCTION SLIDE RULE ELECTRONIC PLUS MEMORY CALCULATOR W J4T 11 different models in T. I., 4 in Rockwell ... BRING THIS AD WITH STUDENT I.D. and get a student discount. TI-2550, hand-held fourfunction plus full Memory system and percent key. Fixed or floating decimal, 8- digit display and automatic constant. A most versatile calculator that operates on rechargeable batteries or AC adapter-charger (included). 16 Scientific functions PLUS 6 key memory. I^arge green 8 Digit display, common & natural log and antilog..Trig and inverse trig, degreeradian mode, recirocal, PI, sum of s quares Etc. Complete with rechargeable batteries, charger and carrying case... AT BRANDTS 8 THE PARKSIDE RAN GER Wednesday, Oct. 2 2 , 1 9 7 5 Women show improvement beating Carthage, Beloit, G.B. by Thom Aiello The Rangers women's tennis team finished their dual meet season on the up-beat by beating Carthage, 4-1, and Beloit 5-0. The match at Carthage was started Wednesday, but it was stopped by darkness with the Rangers leading 3-0. The games were completed at Carthage on Thursday, with Parkside's number one doubles team, Sandy Kingsfield and Kathy Feichtner, winning, and the number two singles player, Iris Gericke, losing. Parkside continued its winning ways last Saturday, beating UWGreen Bay, 5-0, on home courts. That win brought the Rangers record to 5-5 on the year. Swimmers suffer losses by Bruce Wagner The Ranger women's swimming team was matched last weekend against UW-Whitewater and crosstown rival Carthage, and placing third in the meet. Outstanding for Parkside in this meet were: Mary Beth Leitch with a 3:03.8 time to place third in the 200 individual medley; Sheila Craig with second place, 40.6 in the 50 yard backstroke and second place, 1:29.9 in the 100 yard backstroke; Sandi Craig with a third place, 46.7 in the 50 ya rd butterfly; and Gail Olsen placed second in the diving competition. The 200 yard Volleyball team playing inconsistant by Thom Aiello Parkside's women's volleyball team continued its inconsistent play last week, dropping its season record to 0-7. Last Tuesday the Rangers hosted Milwaukee Area Technical College, winning the first game 15-7, before losing 15-1 and 12-9. In the last game the Rangers were staging a comeback when the time ran out. Each game must be completed within eight minutes. Last Saturday the volleyball squad traveled to Whitewater, only to fall to UW-Whitewater 15- 2 and 15-8. The Ranger women also lost to Rock Valley Junior College there, though the contests were much closer. Parkside won the first game, 15-10, before dropping the next two by small margins, 15-10 an d 15-11. The Rangers play at UWMilwaukee, with Carthage, this Tuesday evening before taking on UW-Oshkosh and UW-Eau Claire, at Oshkosh this Saturday at 1 p.m. Next Tuesday, Oct. 28, the Rangers play host to UWWaukesha, starting at 7 p.m. H E I L K M AN S Old / Pure Brewed |J From God's Country. On tap at the Skellar TAPES LEATHER GBBDS PIPES 0NE SWEET BREAM 5010 7TH AVENUE KEN05HA Coach Judy Gotta said the team did not look too good at the season's start, but it showed a "lot of improvement," and it did a fine job as the season progressed. Gotta added, "We were hoping for a winning season but, looking back, we had to play UW-Milwaukee twice," and they were a fairly tough obstacle to get by. free style relay team placed third. In last week's action, Parkside made a much better showing against Oshkosh and Lawrance University in a double-dual meet held at Oshkosh. In the Oshkosh meet, Parkside lost to UW-0 by a 93-22 score. ASA schedules study sessions Sessions in exam preparation, taking class notes, and writing term papers will be sponsored by the Adult Student Association in conjunction with the Academic Skills Program and the Library. All interested persons are invited to attend sessions and can sign up at the counseling outpost in the Gree nque st conco urse Programs will be held in the Academic Skills Area on the third floor of the Library. More information may be obtained from counselor Connie Cummings, 2225. pays 51/2% on passbook Savings'-I On-Campus Service. . .Room 235 Tallent Rail Phone: 553-2150 Main Office: 1400 No. Newman Rd. Racine Phone 634-6661 654-3578 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource The Parkside Ranger, Volume 4, issue 8, October 22, 1975 Description An account of the resource Student newspaper of the University of Wisconsin-Parkside, Kenosha, Wis. Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1975-10-22 Subject The topic of the resource College student newspapers and periodicals Student publications University of Wisconsin-Parkside--Newspapers Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource Newspaper Language A language of the resource English Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant Kenosha, Wisconsin Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available University of Wisconsin-Parkside Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource The Board of Regents of the University Wisconsin System chancellor alan guskin community dean eugene norwood